AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lyudmila Shved

STATC1000 · MATH582 · MATH12 · MATH001341657 · MATH013 · MATH13 · MATH000A · MATH0013 · MATH0000A · 72 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
72.22%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Strong pick for stats if you and use her notes and office hours.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear stats lecturesALEKS-heavy homeworkOpen-note friendly examsCaring and availableDeadline strict
  • Most students say her notes, videos, and reviews make statistics understandable even for math-anxious learners.
  • and deadlines strict, but late passes, , and matching reviews help.
  • Show up, finish ALEKS or weekly HW, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

, and stay on deadlines commonly report A or A+, sometimes skipping the final.

Both formats support easy A with work; online adds discussion and late-pass mechanics.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Stats content is manageable with her packets and videos, though not zero-effort for weak math backgrounds.

; online difficulty depends on self-pacing with ALEKS.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

notes, yet some online and hybrid-style sections allow more flexibility.

In-person more often mandatory; and sometimes optional.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Roughly three in , and fair paths to good grades.

In-person praise is steadier; online has more extreme love-or-hate spikes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and help, but some call her tough on partial credit and submission formatting.

Format shift

Online formatting zeros and .

Workload

Moderate

46/100

Weekly ALEKS or , yet many say it stays doable if you attend and .

Format shift

Recent online comments stress heavier busywork than older easy-A posts.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

, and exam reviews matching tests drive strong teaching praise.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strong in both formats, with online clarity especially valued.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Homework and discussions matter, but .

Format shift

Some in-person notes say tests can be around 60-70 percent; online also uses discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise thorough lectures, note packets, and caring support; long lectures and lots of .

Main concern

Long lecture blocks and .

What students said

“DO the hw and ask questions in lecture and it will be an easy A.”
STATC1000
“ and you are able to have one page of notes.”
MATH0013
“Lectures are boring had trouble not falling asleep almost evey class.”
MATH0013

Remote format

Online

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online stats works well for organized students: , and , though a minority call her rigid, rude, or homework-heavy.

Main concern

and strict submission rules can feel unforgiving.

What students said

“The and the reviews are usually the same material!”
MATH0013
“Easiest math class I've ever taken.”
MATH13
“She is extremely anal about how you turn your work in.”
MATH0013

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are predictable from reviews and often allow notes, making them student-friendly if .

Open note or one-page notesReviews match examsALEKS topic masteryExtra creditDiscussion participation

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review closely, and reward students who complete weekly homework.

One-page notesReview equals examFew or no quizzesHomework similar to tests
“ of notes allowed during exams”
MATH0013
“ and you are able to have one page of notes.”
MATH0013

Online

Online exams are described as open note with reviews matching test material; timing windows can be awkward for workers.

Open-note examsMatching reviewsALEKS completion gatesDiscussion boards
“The and the reviews are usually the same material!”
MATH0013
“Online class and had to do exams from 2-5pm on a Friday, which i guess is fine if you don't work.”
MATH013

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DO the hw and ask questions in lecture and it will be an easy A. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 math and stats reviews, balancing online and , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

80/100

“Absolutely wonderful professor; I tend to struggle with math, but the way she taught made it so easy to understand.”

👍 Recommendation

76/100

“ .”

📗 Easy A Path

78/100

“Easy class. Good teacher. Just show up to class, pay attention, do the and you're good.”

📝 Workload Caution

46/100

“She expects you to spend over 8 hours on just STATS.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and she posts videos in HW for extra help.
  • Lectures are a tad boring but I love her personality.
  • She would pause her lectures to see if everyone understood the topic.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you and :)
  • tests are like 70% of your grade so doing the homework and review is very important.
  • Easy A if you work hard.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Tools

  • We used Aleks, which u had to pay for. Besides that she adds her own videos to each topic.
  • Playposit video lectures and myopenmath as her curriculum and it was a great no cost format.
  • She is extremely anal about how you turn your work in.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

72

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews across years and both formats with , and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 540
4 out of 511
3 out of 55
2 out of 57
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH001322 reviews
MATH1313 reviews
STATC10005 reviews
MATH0133 reviews
MATH0000A2 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH000A2 reviews
MATH0013416571 review
MATH121 review
MATH5821 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

29

A+ 11 · A 17 · A- 1

B range

11

B+ 4 · B 7

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1