AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Andrew Fix

PHILO2ETHICS · PHIL0004 · PHIL4 · PHIL0002 · HIST0023 · PHIL1 · PHIL300 · HUM10 · HUM0010 · POL300 · PHIL002 · PHIL12 · PHIL04 · PHIL02 · PHIL0027 · LGBT0001 · PHIL06 · PHIL0006 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

; treat current online sections as high risk for delayed or missing grades.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate philosophy lecturerOnline grading black holeGraded by few thingsEngaging in personDisorganized online
  • In-person students often love his passion and
  • Recent online courses draw and silence
  • Philosophy content is interesting but and participation

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many As come from effort-based check-ins, few graded items, and curves, but reading and participation still matter.

Online grades can land high despite chaos; in-person As usually require showing up and turning work in.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Philosophy readings and , though lectures and .

Online material is often called easy but frustrating; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Some sections require attendance or Zoom presence, while .

Online and and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Strong in-person enthusiasm keeps him recommendable overall despite serious online service failures.

In-person reviews push recommendation up; many recent .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

66/100

Graded-by-few-things check-ins, curves, and effort-based standards help, though .

Format shift

In person, flexible check-ins feel fair; and opaque.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Reading notes, papers, quizzes, and projects appear regularly, but .

Format shift

Online courses often pile reading and projects; in person can be lighter with few graded items.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

In-person lectures are frequently excellent, but online presence and organization drag the overall experience down.

Format shift

Teaching quality is clearly better in person than in recent online sections.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Check-ins, notes, papers, and a .

Format shift

Online assessment is often delayed papers and discussions; in person uses check-ins, notes, and a few tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person he is often called passionate, hilarious, and fair, with engaging lectures and creative assignments.

Main concern

Occasional tangents, vague notes, and .

What students said

“Honestly one of . Really kind and lovable dude”
PHIL02
“His lectures are engaging, and so is he! Everyone should experience .”
PHIL0002
“the curriculum was vague and PPs were rarely followed; he was .”
PHIL0006

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

late or , and .

Main concern

and little instructor presence after early weeks.

What students said

“ .”
PHIL0002
“he did not grade a ”
PHIL0006
“the professor was not active in the class in the last month and a half of the 8 week course”
HIST-0023

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is usually sparse and flexible, with proctored finals.

Few graded itemsCheck-in gradingCurved testsReading quizzesPapers

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

writing graded fairly and few total assessments.

Curved testsFew quizzesWriting feedbackCheck-in grading
“ so don't sweat if you don't fully understand”
PHILO2ETHICS
“ and straight forward and he gives a lot of .”
PHIL06

Online

Online reviews emphasize missing grades and .

Late gradingConfusing quizzesPapersDiscussion notes
“ formatting”
LGBT-0001
“ .”
PHIL0002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Everyone should experience .”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, contrasting strong in-person teaching with . Credibility rating: High.

🔥 In-Person Passion

85/100

“Honestly one of .”

📭

20/100

“ .”

⚖️ Flexible Check-In Grades

68/100

“ and instead you check in at the beginning, middle, and end.”

👍 Conditional Recommendation

74/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Fun lectures and
  • super engaging to listen to

Theme 2

💻 About Online Classes

  • but easy class
  • none of my work mattered since he ONLY grade 1 assignment
  • Joke of a teacher

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • really easy to pass if and show up
  • turn in the assignments and study for the test and you'll pass easy
  • Go above & beyond what's ask to get an A

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

36 detailed reviews with a and multi-year coverage make the pattern reliable.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 510
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PHIL00028 reviews
PHIL00066 reviews
PHIL43 reviews
HUM102 reviews
LGBT-00012 reviews
Show 13 more courses
PHIL00042 reviews
PHIL062 reviews
HIST-00231 review
HUM00101 review
PHIL0021 review
PHIL00271 review
PHIL021 review
PHIL041 review
PHIL11 review
PHIL121 review
PHIL3001 review
PHILO2ETHICS1 review
POL3001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 1 · A 18

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

3

C+ 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1