AI Rate Professor

Human Development

Veronica Rivera-Carpenter

HDEV1 · HDEV0001 · HDEV11 · HDEV012 · HDEV0012 · HDEV12 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
21.88%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you need this exact HDEV section and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLecture About HerselfNo Late WorkHeavy BusyworkHard Exams
  • and zero flexibility on late work.
  • Lectures fill with personal stories that many call boring and off-topic.
  • and papers) while many feel they learn little.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even hard workers report Cs and stalled grades; a few As exist but and perfect work under harsh rubrics.

; online stresses weekly volume more.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Not conceptually elite, but volume, nitpicky papers, and .

; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Skip class and you will not pass tags and .

In-person is stricter on physical presence; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and repeated worst-professor warnings outweigh a small supportive minority.

Negative tone is strong in both online and in-person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

Tough grader tags dominate; unclear criteria, no makeups, and .

Format shift

Harshness is consistent online and in person.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

, and quizzes create high time demand.

Format shift

Online reviews stress weekly count most; and tests.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Many call lectures self-centered and boring with low support; a minority finds stories useful.

Format shift

Both formats criticize lecture style; online adds accessibility complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and papers plus difficult exams and .

Format shift

Online leans assignments; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person she is lecture-heavy with personal stories, strict on , and low recommendation.

Main concern

Boring and formatting stickiness.

What students said

“ . All her lectures are about herself and personal stories that shouldn't be shared in class.”
HDEV0001
“god forbid you leave class early, she'll leave a comment on it and ”
HDEV0001
“AWFUL. . Her lectures are boring and if you do read the text book.”
HDEV0001

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students report crushing weekly homework, unfair low-point , and .

Main concern

No late work even for illness or family death; grades barely move despite heavy effort.

What students said

“ . It's almost like she is setting us up to fail. Doesn't accept late work even if it's for a good reason.”
HDEV0012
“12 assignments WEEKLY. Very difficult assignments that end up be worth 5 points”
HDEV0012
“ , but very very very hard to pass and she wont encourage and support you.”
HDEV1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as extremely hard, detail-focused, and poorly aligned with learning even when open book.

Hard textbook examsDetail-heavy questionsOpen book but trickyWeekly quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

facts, online exams that are detailed, and open-book but tricky formats.

Insanely hard testsDetail triviaOpen book but trickyOnline exams
“Her lectures are boring and if you do read the text book.”
HDEV0001
“I didn't care for her lecture heavy teaching style and extremely specific and .”
HDEV1

Online

Online students report very hard book-based exams and .

Book examsHard to passWeekly quizzes
“ , but very very very hard to pass and she wont encourage and support you.”
HDEV1
“Weekly quizzes, 2-3 assignments, and 4 papers throughout the semester.”
HDEV12

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . It's almost like she is setting us up to fail. Doesn't accept late work even if it's for a good reason.”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews (16 online, 16 in , and low flexibility. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Quality

24/100

“Boring and unclear. I am .”

📝

16/100

“She's a very hard grader for absolutely no reason. Her expectations are high but .”

📦 Busywork Load

22/100

“12 assignments WEEKLY. Very difficult assignments that end up be worth 5 points”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All her lectures are about herself and personal stories
  • she only talks about her family
  • She also goes off-topic in her lectures all the time.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Impossible to make up your grade if you fall behind and is a .
  • I teetered on the edge of a D and C no matter what I did.
  • and are extremely hard.

Theme 3

🧱 About Flexibility

  • Doesn't accept late work even if it's for a good reason.
  • refused to help me by extending a deadline by ONE DAY when I got a .
  • She refused to give me an , then failed me on it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

32 reviews across online and in-person with long time span and highly and lectures.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 520

Course coverage

HDEV19 reviews
HDEV00016 reviews
HDEV00125 reviews
HDEV115 reviews
HDEV125 reviews
Show 1 more courses
HDEV0122 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

10

C+ 3 · C 5 · C- 2

D range

2

D+ 1 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values