AI Rate Professor

Human Development

Michelle Boucher

HDEV9 · HD43 · HDEV1 · HDEV0001 · HD1 · HDEV001 · HDEV2 · HDEV01 · HD46 · HDEV4 · 48 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
63.16%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Prefer her in person if you like funny lectures and can show up; be cautious online if .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyFunny in personUnresponsive emailsEasy with attendanceExtra creditMixed online
  • In person is often fun, funny, and an easy A if you attend.
  • Online draws and weak communication.
  • Workload and and term.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many get A with attendance and simple work, but grades also include B/C and .

In person more often easy A ; online grades more mixed.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Human Development material is generally straightforward when lectures and readings are followed.

Both formats beginner-level; online can feel heavier due to long embedded lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and skipping hurts.

In ; online often requires discussion participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Fans love her humor and care; critics cite unresponsiveness, disorganization, and rigid rules.

In person leans more recommendable; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Some call her fair with ; others say tough grader or half-credit for .

Format shift

In person often fair/easy; online more tough or inconsistent reports.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Some sections barely have outside work; others pile Perusall reading, quizzes, and long lecture videos.

Format shift

In person can be light; online more reading and lecture-question load.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Hilarious engaging lectures for many, offset by frequent complaints about organization and communication.

Format shift

In person teaching praised more; online delivery criticized more.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

Quizzes, discussions, readings, papers, and .

Format shift

Both formats assignment-heavy; some in .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person students often love her humor and , but some cite disorganization, shared textbooks, or rigid policies.

Main concern

and occasional classroom control or organization issues.

What students said

“She's great! , but the assignments in this course are super easy!”
HDEV2
“She is the ! She is extremely sweet and super funny.”
HDEV0001
“Doesn't grade on time, doesn't answer emails on time, very privileged mentality”
HDEV1

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some call it easy with , tough grading, and poor email response.

Main concern

Unresponsive help and is easy.

What students said

“Will not reach back out if you ask for help and is a .”
HDEV9
“Professor took the whole summer to grade all the last week of summer.”
HDEV001
“She had very clear requirements and , and it was easy to follow.”
HDEV9

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments often use quizzes and finals.

Open Book QuizzesOnline QuizzesFew High-Stakes ExamsWeekly Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person often open-note online quizzes or .

Open note online quizzesNo midterm no final in some sectionsAttendance graded
“ and 2 papers.”
HDEV9
“ and online and the notes cover everything needed”
HD1

Online

, and essays; proctoring not clearly described.

Weekly quizzesEmbedded lecture questionsEssays
“She has multiple quizzes every week, 2-3 hour lectures with questions throughout”
HDEV9
“Lectures are super long and have embedded questions, so you have to listen.”
HDEV001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . , so as long as you show up, you'll be fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 48 reviews, balancing in-person praise with online communication complaints. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“She is the ! She is extremely sweet and super funny.”

📧 Responsiveness Issues

40/100

“Doesn't grade on time, doesn't answer emails on time”

📝 Easy When You Show Up

68/100

“ , but the assignments in this course are super easy!”

👍 Split Recommendation

55/100

“everyone basically got an easy A”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures had a lot of fun elements
  • she makes it fun

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • everyone basically got an easy A
  • if you do the work, is an easy A

Theme 3

📧 About Communication

  • she is hard to get in touch with
  • Will not reach back out if you ask for help
  • Instead of responding to emails when asking for help,

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

48

Recent reviews read by the AI

48

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

48 reviews across many years with both strong praise and strong criticism, giving a clear but polarized picture.

Inside 48 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 59
3 out of 54
2 out of 58
1 out of 57

Course coverage

HDEV216 reviews
HDEV99 reviews
HDEV16 reviews
HDEV00015 reviews
HDEV0014 reviews
Show 5 more courses
HDEV43 reviews
HD12 reviews
HD431 review
HD461 review
HDEV011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 6 · A 17 · A- 1

B range

10

B+ 6 · B 2 · B- 2

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1