AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lana Anishchenko

MATH300 · MATH27 · MATHD · MATH0000D · MATH581 · MATH582 · MATH000D · MATH2 · MATH30 · MATH42 · MATH13 · MATH00D · MATH00B · MATH31 · MATH0000A · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
66/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you will attend, do the , and can follow her accented lectures for solid support.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful outside classLots of homeworkWeekly quizzesThick accentSupportive math
  • and after-class help.
  • Math courses are demanding with and frequent quizzes.
  • Accent and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

and ; reported grades are mixed.

Both formats require work; little evidence of free A online or in person.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Trig, calc, and stats content plus pace make courses intellectually demanding for many.

In person comments dominate; online sample too small to soften difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Many tags and comments say skip class and you will not pass; weekly in-class quizzes enforce presence.

In person strongly mandatory; online also uses required meetings for some sections.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

and organization, with a vocal minority warning about accent and clarity.

Recommendation stronger in person; online evidence is mixed and sparse.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Clear criteria and some , but tough quizzes and not an .

Format shift

Most evidence is in person; online has a .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and frequent tests.

Format shift

Heavy load reported mainly in person; online also notes lots of homework and meetings.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

, and after-class help; others find accent and .

Format shift

In person has richer teaching evidence; online mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and finals share weight rather than pure projects.

Format shift

In person details dominate assessment picture.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and either great concept support or confusion from accent/explanations.

Main concern

Accent clarity and .

What students said

“She's great at explaining concepts and and .”
MATH00D
“ , and you'll do fine.”
MATH13
“Absolutely terrible you can't understand a word she says.”
MATH13

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one student felt supported with extra videos; others disliked required live meetings or .

Main concern

Online may still force live meetings or feel poorly explained.

What students said

“There is a ton of online meetings that are twice a week.”
MATH300
“Ms Lana answered my questions and even found me tutorials for my calculator”
MATH300
“She is sloppy and gets angry when you correct her.”
MATH30

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard math testing with frequent quizzes and scheduled midterms/finals; .

Weekly QuizzesPop QuizzesMidterms and FinalOnline Homework

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person uses pop quizzes, several midterms, final, and .

Pop quizzes3 midterms and finalExtra credit on testsOnline homework
“Homework online, 3 midterms, quizzes, and final. Also some .”
MATH27
“ and 2 for the final.”
MATH13

Online

and meeting requirements.

Tough GraderRequired meetings
“ .”
MATH30

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and you'll do fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 , and accent clarity split. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“She's great at explaining concepts and and .”

📚 Heavy Workload

28/100

“there's ALOT of .”

🗣️ Accent Clarity Split

50/100

“She does have a heavy accent so avoid if that's an issue for you.”

👍 Recommendation

64/100

“200% would recommend , dont even think twice.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • great at explaining concepts
  • shows different ways to work out problems

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Not an easy class but interesting
  • ALOT of
  • if you have a but it is still difficult to get an A

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • stayed after class to help out
  • Very fast response to emails
  • inspired and helped me get through

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

35 reviews over many years with , and accent.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 514
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH139 reviews
MATHD6 reviews
MATH273 reviews
MATH303 reviews
MATH0000A2 reviews
Show 10 more courses
MATH000D2 reviews
MATH3002 reviews
MATH0000D1 review
MATH00B1 review
MATH00D1 review
MATH21 review
MATH311 review
MATH421 review
MATH5811 review
MATH5821 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1