AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mohammad Mirzaagha

MATHD · MATH0000D · MATHSTAT · STATS13 · STATS1 · MATH12 · MATH42 · STAT · MATH013 · MATH120 · MATH13 · STATISTICS · STATSSS1 · MATH32 · STAT13 · STATS · MATH000D · 77 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
31.82%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the math and and homework.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to UnderstandDaily Pop QuizzesLots of HomeworkSelf-Taught RequiredPolarized Reviews
  • Recent reviews slam accent, illegible board work, and weak teaching
  • Older stats reviews often call it doable with homework and
  • Online sections lean heavily on MyMathLab with typos and little support

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Many students can earn A or B with homework and , but recent classes feel harsh and quiz-heavy.

Online A ; in-person outcomes split between easy-A older comments and tough recent ones.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty is mid for college math and stats, but pace and .

Online leans self-paced MyMathLab; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and you will not pass, and quizzes happen every meeting.

; online attendance less central.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Take-again rate near 32% and recent comments strongly warn against his classes.

Online reviews are almost all negative; in-person is mixed but recent tone is harsh.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and some clear criteria help, but tough-grader and .

Format shift

Online grade errors and typos hurt trust; in-person is mixed.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and stacks of printed papers appear repeatedly.

Format shift

; .

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Older praise for structure conflicts with frequent complaints about accent, board errors, and no real teaching.

Format shift

Online teaching is weakest; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Daily quizzes, chapter tests, and .

Format shift

Online uses platform quizzes/tests; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some older students found clear structure and easy A with effort, while many recent students report , and hard-to-read board work.

Main concern

Accent, illegible handwriting, daily quizzes, and stacks of .

What students said

“Not a good teacher. He does not teach but wants things done every class and wants a quiz done every class.”
STATS
“If you study enough and do the , it's an easy A.”
MATH13

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Mostly self-taught via MyMathLab or , and grade confusion.

Main concern

Little real instruction, email errors, and .

What students said

“It's all self taught through MyMathLab. My biggest issue were the typos on the quizzes.”
MATH12
“ !!! His lectures were convoluted, confusing, and unhelpful.”
STATS1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is quiz-and-test heavy with mixed friendliness depending on era and section.

Daily pop quizzesTest heavySome open notes historicallyMyMathLab quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Daily quizzes and frequent tests; older comments mention notes or formulas allowed, but .

Daily quizzesTest heavySome notes allowed historically
“We met once a week for three hours, no material between meetings and review on.”
STATS
“ . Index card .”
MATH120

Online

Online work runs through MyMathLab or dual platforms with typos and ; .

MyMathLab quizzesUnclear due datesSelf-taught platform work
“4 out of 8 of the .”
MATH12
“He used two different platforms and graded some things in each, making it impossible to know my grade.”
STATS1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Never replies to emails, hard to understand, incredibly illegible handwriting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting polarized teaching quality and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“He does not teach but wants things done every class and wants a quiz done every class.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“ .”

📝 Workload Pressure

32/100

“He gives too much HW. if you struggle in math.”

⚖️ Grade Path

55/100

“A grade if you are naturally good at math OR if you work hard.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Could barely understand his own handwriting on board
  • He constantly messes up the problems that he does on the board

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is a quiz everyday and business calculus moves quick
  • If you study enough and do the , it's an easy A
  • You have to teach your self

Theme 3

💻 About Online Sections

  • It's all self taught through MyMathLab
  • !!!
  • There is little to or instruction

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

77

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews spanning many years with rich detail and a credible.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 516
3 out of 518
2 out of 59
1 out of 515

Course coverage

MATH1311 reviews
MATH127 reviews
MATH0135 reviews
STATS4 reviews
MATH0000D3 reviews
Show 15 more courses
STATS133 reviews
MATHSTAT2 reviews
STATS12 reviews
STATSSS12 reviews
121 review
606811 review
816471 review
MATH000D1 review
MATH1201 review
MATH321 review
MATH421 review
MATHD1 review
STAT1 review
STAT131 review
STATISTICS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

24 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 3 · A 11

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1