AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Pitt Turner

MATH00E · MATH8 · MATH0030 · MATH0581 · MATH0012 · MATH0000E · MATH30 · MATH0029 · MATH32 · MATHE87191 · MATH31 · MATH000E · 0000E · MATH00A · 78 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
54.55%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if and self-study; he helps those who engage, but many feel lectures leave them lost.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but polarizingSelf-teach heavyLots of homeworkTest heavyGroup learning
  • some call him the everything.
  • , and and grade risk.
  • Online Canvas and while others feel supported.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Many students report grinding hours daily and still failing or barely passing despite second chances on some assessments.

Online reviews stress self-teach busywork; and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Average difficulty is high, with algebra and calc students calling the pace and volume hard.

Both formats report challenge; online often feels harder due to self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory or warn that skipping tanks the grade.

Online requires video discussion participation; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Take-again rate is about 55% with loud love-or-hate splits depending on effort and section.

algebra complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Tough grader tags and and .

Format shift

Online students ; in-person notes some concept-focused fairness.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of , and multi-hour weekly loads are constant themes.

Format shift

Online hours and video posts can feel heavier; and tests.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Half the room praises caring check-ins and great lectures; half says he does not teach and .

Format shift

; online algebra reviews are harsher.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests, quizzes, and second-chance assessments drive .

Format shift

; but still needed to pass.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person calculus and algebra range from amazing check-ins and and no real teaching.

Main concern

Polarizing and homework if you fall behind.

What students said

“ . He made calculus seem easy and approachable.”
MATH0030
“Horrible teacher but ”
MATH0012
“He just puts you in groups to go over topics and doesn't go over any of the topics.”
MATH0012

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online MATH0012 mixes caring feedback with , and .

Main concern

, and teaching yourself via Lumen/textbook.

What students said

“you kinda are teaching yourself the materials”
MATH0012
“ ”
MATH0012
“I spent 16 hours a week trying to pass this class.”
MATH0012

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes dominate grading, sometimes with redos or , but not student-friendly open-book setups.

Test heavyQuiz redos sometimesHomework-aligned questionsPop quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and test heavy, sometimes with pop quizzes and .

Test heavyPop quizzesExam questions from homeworkSlight curves sometimes
“ and quiz heavly.”
MATH30
“He and tests) so .”
MATH32

Online

Online reviews mention timed assessments and but do .

Test heavyBusywork assessmentsLimited time on assessments
“He does not give enough time on assessments and marks you down for the most ridiculous things.”
MATH0012
“ and allows to you to try again given a valid reason.”
MATH0012

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Succeeding in his class comes down to your effort. 11/10!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (9 online, 41 in-person), highlighting the . Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Caring Support

70/100

“Super caring and he genuinely wants you to succeed.”

📚

30/100

“Horrible teacher but ”

📝 Heavy Workload

22/100

“I spent 16 hours a week trying to pass this class.”

⚖️

48/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He doesn't teach a thing and makes you teach yourself everything from the book.
  • He constantly makes sure that no one is stuck or confused.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A lot of homework but not required to be turned in.
  • and quiz heavly.
  • I spend almost 10 hours a day working on math and yet still failing.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • you kinda are teaching yourself the materials

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

78

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across many years and formats show consistent polarizing themes with strong sample size.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 518
3 out of 58
2 out of 58
1 out of 515

Course coverage

MATH001218 reviews
MATH308 reviews
MATH00305 reviews
MATH000E3 reviews
MATH323 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH83 reviews
MATH0000E2 reviews
MATH00A2 reviews
0000E1 review
MATH00291 review
MATH00E1 review
MATH05811 review
MATH311 review
MATHE871911 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 3 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

7

C+ 2 · C 5

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 4 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 2