AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cliff Myers

MATH008 · MATH10 · TRIG0008 · MATH000A · MATH32 · MATH29 · MATHD · MATHD7254 · MATHA · MATH0012 · MATH30 · MATHTRIG · MATH31 · TRIGTRIG · MATH8 · MATH0001 · MATH12 · MATHALGE · TRIGSECT · MATHD6504 · 107 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

unless every other math section is full and you can teach yourself from the book.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRude & CondescendingALEKS Self-TeachBrutal ExamsZero HelpfulnessAvoid At All Costs
  • and lack of real instruction
  • Heavy reliance on ALEKS or
  • Exams are harsh with low class averages and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

, and poor teaching make high grades rare for most students.

Both formats report failure risk; almost no grade data shows easy As.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

14/100

Material feels harder than it should because lectures confuse and ALEKS or book work carries the class.

In-person calculus and algebra sections are especially brutal; online is still ALEKS-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Strict absence rules, daily quizzes, and .

In-person comments stress late/absence punishments; online data is thin but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

; students repeatedly say pick anyone else.

Negative consensus is strongest in person; online reviews are fewer but still hostile.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

16/100

No , and little grade flexibility.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

22/100

Hundreds of ALEKS topics, daily quizzes, and .

Format shift

ALEKS-driven sections dominate both formats.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students say he is rude, confuses simple ideas, and often replaces teaching with silent software time.

Format shift

A few outliers like his humor or office help; vast majority rate teaching as awful.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Daily quizzes and .

Format shift

and assessment; traditional sections are exam-centered.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Near-universal reports of , and punishing tests.

Main concern

Hostile classroom climate and .

What students said

“ taking. He's been extremely condescending”
MATH0001
“We spend two solid hours working silently on ALEKS in class. There is ZERO lecture involved”
MATH12
“class average was usually 50% on exams”
MATH31

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and ALEKS-centered with very hard outcomes.

Main concern

Disrespectful interactions and zero instructional support online.

What students said

“This teacher is horrible he was disrespectful and and told me i was studip countless times”
MATHA
“I went in his office to ask him a question and all he said was go to the math center, and did you even read the syllabus?!”
MATHD

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequently described as insanely hard with class averages near failing.

Hard Written ExamsLow Class AveragesDaily QuizzesNotes Sheet Sometimes Allowed

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and self-written tests with very low averages.

Daily QuizzesInsane Exam DifficultyClass Average Around 50%Optional Notes Sheet
“Myers writes his own tests that are usually pretty insane, class average was usually 50% on exams”
MATH31
“He also has a quiz every class so you have to go to lecture”
MATH8

Online

Online comments emphasize ALEKS assessments and .

ALEKS AssessmentsHigh Failure Risk
“ ”
MATHA
“He is absolutely the hardest teacher I have ever had”
MATHD

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting hostility, ALEKS self-teaching, and . Credibility rating: High.

💥 Teaching Disaster

18/100

“ taking”

🚫 Recommendation Collapse

8/100

“ AS A TEACHER!”

📉

22/100

“class average was usually 50% on exams”

😤 Classroom Climate

15/100

“He is Very Rude, his comments are offensive”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • ZERO lecture involved
  • reads out from the book

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • hardest teacher I have ever had
  • class average was usually 50%
  • NO

Theme 3

😠 About Character

  • extremely condescending
  • disrespectful and not helpful
  • rude, short, and completely unhelpful

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

107

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty mostly detailed, highly consistent negative reviews over many years yield strong confidence despite sparse grade reporting.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 514
3 out of 59
2 out of 535
1 out of 543

Course coverage

MATH129 reviews
MATHA7 reviews
MATH316 reviews
MATHD6 reviews
MATH84 reviews
Show 15 more courses
MATH000A2 reviews
MATH00122 reviews
MATH302 reviews
MATH00011 review
MATH0081 review
MATH101 review
MATH291 review
MATH321 review
MATHALGE1 review
MATHD65041 review
MATHD72541 review
MATHTRIG1 review
TRIG00081 review
TRIGSECT1 review
TRIGTRIG1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Fail 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1