AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jolie Huston

MATHD · MATH581 · MATHA · STATS13 · MATHD00 · MATH0000 · MATH13 · MATHA000A · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Great pick if you struggle with math and want a supportive teacher; be ready for homework and mixed experiences in advanced sections.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAccessible and caringClear grading criteriaExtra credit on testsHomework-heavyPolarizing by course level
  • Strong support and availability for students who struggle with math
  • Many lower-level stats and and notes on tests
  • Higher-level or group-based courses draw complaints of , and weak test prep

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

, and homework-aligned exams help, but tough grading and .

Online praise is strong but sparse; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Stats and intro math often feel manageable with support, while some sections rate as hard and test-heavy.

Almost all .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some students report and skip-class warnings, while .

; in-person reports mix mandatory and flexible.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and care, but a vocal minority warns against advanced or poorly supported sections.

The single online review is glowing; but polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Clear criteria and help, but and failing warnings appear often enough to keep grading only fair.

Format shift

In-person reviews carry both lenient and ; online is only positive.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

, and frequent handouts stack up even when lectures are clear.

Format shift

Workload complaints .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

, and available, though some advanced sections report weak notes and poor test review match.

Format shift

Online and lower-level in-person praise is stronger than older MATH581 critiques.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Homework and handouts matter a lot, but tests and .

Format shift

and test-heavy designs.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person and critical higher-level or homework-heavy sections.

Main concern

and review alignment.

What students said

“If you struggle in math or need good grades. Prof. Huston is amazing! Truly thankful to find her.”
MATH0000
“Allowed notes on the ! She also made handouts with example and practice problems for every section which made studying a breeze.”
MATH13
“Her reviews for the , and she wasn't very helpful either.”
MATH581

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One strong online review praises clear lectures, 1-on-1 help, and mental-health-aware support.

Main concern

Only one online review, so online experience is lightly evidenced.

What students said

“Math has always been the subject I was most insecure about, but Ms. Jolie has been an incredible teacher and I am so much more confident about my skills.”
MATH13

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and , but some sections feel misaligned with review materials.

Notes allowed on testsHomework-aligned questionsExtra credit on testsMixed review quality

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person, several students report , and sometimes hard or poorly matched exams.

Notes allowed on testsHomework and review guide questionsExtra credit on tests
“Allowed notes on the !”
MATH13
“ , if . You can use them on the test :)”
MATH13
“Do the homework and there will be no surprises on the tests.”
MATH0000

Online

Online comments .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you struggle in math or need good grades. Prof. Huston is amazing! Truly thankful to find her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting support, workload, and course-level polarization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“She was great! Made stats very easy to understand and .”

❤️ Student Support

80/100

“Available for 1 on 1 when you , and clearing interested in the mental health of her students.”

📚 Workload Reality

42/100

“ so it stacks up, bring a binder!”

⚖️

55/100

“She offers for tests, and makes what she expects of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She is respectful and kind.
  • It was more of a I do the problem and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Allowed notes on the !
  • unless you want to fail!!
  • Do the homework and there will be no surprises on the tests.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and wants to see you do well.
  • Really cares about students passing with a good grade and .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews span many years with detailed comments and mixed but coherent themes by course level.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH134 reviews
MATH00003 reviews
MATH5813 reviews
MATHA1 review
MATHA000A1 review
Show 3 more courses
MATHD1 review
MATHD001 review
STATS131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values