AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Susie Leobrien

PDEV0001 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid Susie Leobrien based on the : minimal engagement and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLow Interaction OnlinePassive-Aggressive ToneAll-Or-Nothing GradingDisengagedAvoid Online
  • Single online review reports almost no interaction and .
  • as all-or-nothing where a few words can swing 60 points to zero.
  • and questions her in-person style as well.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Only review describes all-or-nothing grading where .

Evidence comes only from the single online review.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty rated mid-range; the main complaint is instructor interaction and .

Evidence comes only from the single online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

available review.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

; student explicitly prefers .

Evidence comes only from the single online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Described as all-or-nothing scoring where a couple of words can turn 60 points into zero.

Format shift

Only online evidence available.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload volume not detailed; .

Format shift

Only online evidence available.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Barely interacted, blunt and passive-aggressive when present, quality rated 1/5.

Format shift

Only online evidence available.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Assessment format not .

Format shift

Only online evidence available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The sole online review criticizes near-zero interaction and harsh binary grading in PDEV0001.

Main concern

Barely interacts and grades can swing from full credit to zero over minor wording.

What students said

“Professor Le barely interacted with the class, and when she did it was blunt and sometimes even passive-aggressive.”
PDEV0001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam proctoring style; .

All-Or-Nothing Scoring

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Single online review does not describe webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy; .

All-Or-Nothing Scoring
“ the difference between 60 points and 0 points being a couple of words.”
PDEV0001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Le barely interacted with the class, and when she did it was blunt and sometimes even passive-aggressive.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 online review; . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Professor Le barely interacted with the class, and when she did it was blunt and sometimes even passive-aggressive.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“I have no idea how she is with classes in person, but I would rather not know.”

⚖️

18/100

“ the difference between 60 points and 0 points being a couple of words.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Le barely interacted with the class.
  • when she did it was blunt and sometimes even passive-aggressive.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the difference between 60 points and 0 points being a couple of words.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2020 online review with no corroborating voices, grades, or later data.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PDEV00011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values