AI Rate Professor

Human Development

Reza Azarmi

PSYC43910 · HDEV0021 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless you have no other option and can teach yourself while dealing with chaotic deadlines.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganized lecturesLast-minute assignmentsCanvas strugglesTough grading feelDo not recommend
  • , and
  • Material itself is not advanced, but the teaching experience is frustrating

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Content is not elite-hard and one student got an A, but and B/B- grades mean an A is not free.

Online review stresses tough grading; policy.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Students call the material easy enough and interesting, with average difficulty around mid-level.

Both formats describe content as manageable; frustration is about teaching, not concept depth.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as mandatory and one tag warns you will not pass if .

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Every review says no to taking him again and ends with .

and in-person comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and graded by few things, with little transparency about standing.

Format shift

; in-person students also report opaque grade tracking.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Reading and sudden writing assignments create stress even when overall volume is not enormous.

Format shift

Online and and abrupt due dates.

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Students , and frustrating class management.

Format shift

Teaching criticism is strong in both formats, with online pain centered on platform setup.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

38/100

Comments emphasize writing assignments, reading, and .

Format shift

; online adds reading and limited Canvas clarity.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person sections are described as unprepared, lecture-heavy, and and .

Main concern

, and missing gradebook transparency.

What students said

“Very unorganized, assignments are only worth 1 point and makes them due at random hours the same day.”
PSYC43910
“his lectures are always unprepared. ”
HDEV0021

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, though email replies were fast.

Main concern

Weak online platform skills and abrupt class management during remote transition.

What students said

“if you are taking this class for credits or it is online, find something new.”
HDEV0021
“Has very little experience with the internet(took him .)”
HDEV0021

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests without study guides and little structured support, so .

No study guidesTests without prep materialsLecture heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

for tests and poorly prepared lectures.

No study guidesNo PowerPoint notesLecture heavy
“He , and does not give study guides for tests.”
HDEV0021

Online

Online comments do not clearly document proctoring tools; risk is more .

Unclear online exam policyReading heavy
“if you are taking this class for credits or it is online, find something new.”
HDEV0021

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“10/10 would not recommend his class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (1 online, 2 in person), highlighting disorganization and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ ”

📂 Organization Problems

15/100

“Very unorganized, assignments are only worth 1 point and makes them due at random hours the same day.”

🖥️ Online Platform Issues

20/100

“Has very little experience with the internet(took him .)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lectures are always unprepared.
  • The material is easy enough and pretty interesting, but his teaching style very frustrating.

Theme 2

📉 About Class Management

  • I didn't know what grade I received in the class until after it was over.
  • Don't buy the book. :)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Three consistent negative reviews across 2019-2020 and both formats raise confidence despite the small sample.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HDEV00212 reviews
PSYC439101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values