AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Jonathan Tees

PHIL04 · PHIL6 · PHIL0006 · PHIL006 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a and can live with many papers and slower grades.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring Philosophy ProfSlow Paper GradingPassionate LecturesSometimes DisorganizedAccessible Outside Class
  • Strong recommendation for passion, care, and willingness to help students succeed
  • friction
  • Lectures can be engaging but

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

A grades are common with effort, but and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Philosophy content and make them clearer.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

Some sections list attendance mandatory while others say no; .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

, and genuine care despite organization issues.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

Described as very fair with and assessment accommodations when the class fell behind.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Tags and comments repeatedly mention many papers plus reading; .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Passionate, caring lectures that make hard material interesting, offset by disorganization and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

and reading work more than high-stakes exams, with occasional pop quizzes.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and papers; students praise care and accessibility but note disorganization and .

Main concern

and occasional disorganization that puts class behind.

What students said

“He was a and took a long time to grade and .”
PHIL04
“I thought he made difficult subject matter really interesting and is very eager to help his students succeed.”
PHIL006
“He cares about student success and will work with you to help you get a good grade.”
PHIL0006

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; no strict proctoring details appear in reviews.

Many PapersPop QuizzesLecture HeavyExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some sections warn of pop quizzes and heavy lectures.

So Many PapersPop QuizzesLecture Heavy
“ to feel that I was improving”
PHIL04
“Professor Tees is very nice and easy .”
PHIL006

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He cares about student success and will work with you to help you get a good grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 , and organization tradeoffs. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“I considered becoming a philosophy major (still might) because of him.”

📝

42/100

“He was a and took a long time to grade and .”

❤️ Care & Access

86/100

“He is passionate, smart and VERY fair professor.”

👍 Recommendation

86/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • a
  • lets people go off on tangents that put the whole class behind

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • So many papers
  • he did modify the assessments to accommodate

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • really cared for my success
  • values each students questions
  • VERY fair professor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews from 2017-2019 are detailed and mostly consistent on care and paper load, but sample size is modest.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL00063 reviews
PHIL0062 reviews
PHIL042 reviews
PHIL61 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values