AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Timothy Houk

PHIL0002 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you will do the readings and put effort into the paper.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging DiscussionsGives Good FeedbackInspirationalClear Grading CriteriaAmazing Lectures
  • Students praise fun interactive discussions and passion for ethics.
  • Quizzes are easy if you do the readings; .
  • Both reviewers earned As and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Both students got As; , but papers and the ethics chart are tougher grades.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Difficulty ratings sit at 2 with , though the paper is described as hard but fun.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and another says it was not.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

and call him amazing, fantastic, and a great professor.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Quizzes reward reading, but papers and the ethics chart are graded more strictly.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

68/100

, and an ethics chart rather than constant grind.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students highlight interactive discussions, knowledge of ethics, passion, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

and ethics chart.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person PHIL0002 felt fun and interactive with group and , and .

Main concern

Paper and ethics chart are graded more strictly than the easy quizzes.

What students said

“Fun and .”
PHIL0002
“The if you do the readings.”
PHIL0002

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes are easy with readings; the harder graded work is a paper and ethics chart.

Easy QuizzesReading-BasedTough Paper

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Quizzes reward doing the readings while .

Easy QuizzesReading-BasedTough Paper
“The quizzes are easy A's if you do the readings. , but fun) and the Ethics chart.”
PHIL0002

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Brand new professor, who did fantastic. Made the class very interactive and fun with group and class discussions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching energy and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Mr. Houk was an amazing teacher. Fun and .”

👍 Recommendation

95/100

“Overall very enjoyable class. Great professor!!!”

📈 Grades & Effort

78/100

“The if you do the readings.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Fun and .
  • Made the class very interactive and fun with group and class discussions.
  • Very knowledgeable in Ethics and passionate about his work.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The if you do the readings.
  • , but fun) and the Ethics chart.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

but limited sample size and detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL00022 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values