AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Mathias Warnes

PHIL352 · PHIL0002 · HUM0005 · WORLDRELIGIONS · PHI300 · HUM001 · HUM0009 · PHIL002 · PHIL2 · HUM1 · PHILOSOPHY · HUM0001 · HUMANITIES1 · HUM101 · PHIL02 · PHIL117 · PHIL0006 · 33 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want engaging philosophy or and will do the reading; most students call him a must-take.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionateDiscussion DrivenChill & CaringDense ReadingEngaging Lectures
  • Nearly every student calls him passionate, knowledgeable, and discussion-friendly in philosophy and humanities.
  • Dense primary-source reading is common, but lectures and .
  • Fair and and high take-again enthusiasm.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students call him fair and easy to please if you read, participate, and engage; A often starts around 85 percent.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Philosophy readings can be dense, but lectures and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

and participation strongly shapes the experience and grade.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Overwhelming praise for passion, discussion, and approachability with .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Multiple students call him fair and and rewards genuine engagement.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Expect , and occasional papers, but not usually overwhelming busywork.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students repeatedly praise energetic lectures, deep knowledge, respectful discussion, and a chill classroom vibe.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of , and finals rather than pure exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person philosophy and humanities , and highly praised for passion, openness, and fair grading.

Main concern

Dense readings and occasional early-career disorganization can throw students who need rigid structure.

What students said

“I have never been more comfortable speaking openly in a class as I have in this one. Fantastic prof!”
PHIL0002
“Getting an A in his class is an 85% or higher. He is a fair and .”
HUMANITIES1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are generally described as fair or average if you study and engage in class discussion.

Average Difficulty TestsCurve PossibleDiscussion-Based Prep

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Tests are average if , and and writing.

Fair TestsPossible CurveReading Responses
“He also has very little hw and makes sure the .”
HUM0001
“ . Overall a great professor.”
HUM001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I have never been more comfortable speaking openly in a class as I have in this one. Fantastic prof!”

Voice snapshots generated from 33 , and fair grading. Credibility rating: High.

🔥 Teaching Passion

90/100

“He's very passionate about what he teaches and will even go as far as .”

👍

96/100

“ . Looking for other classes offered by Dr. Warnes.”

⚖️

82/100

“Getting an A in his class is an 85% or higher. He is a fair and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are engrossing
  • BAMF! The Warnester, great dude
  • He's a cool hipster teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you show up and put in the work you'll do fine
  • Getting an A in his class is an 85% or higher

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He is an extremely kind teacher and very lenient
  • very respectful of his tone with students
  • I adore him!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

33

Recent reviews read by the AI

33

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-three detailed in-person reviews across many courses show strong consistency on teaching passion and fairness.

Inside 33 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 511
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HUM00014 reviews
PHIL00023 reviews
PHIL23 reviews
846032 reviews
HUM00052 reviews
Show 16 more courses
PHI3002 reviews
PHIL00062 reviews
WORLDRELIGIONS2 reviews
00101 review
186491 review
836271 review
HUM00091 review
HUM0011 review
HUM11 review
HUM1011 review
HUMANITIES11 review
PHIL0021 review
PHIL021 review
PHIL1171 review
PHIL3521 review
PHILOSOPHY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2