AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

J Haproff

PHIL50 · PHILO2 · PHIL10 · ETHICS · PHIL02 · HISTORYOFPHIL · PHIL20 · P30 · WORLDRELIGIONS · PHILETHICS · PHILO10 · PHILETHI · PHIL2 · PHIL30 · PHILOSOPHY2 · PHIL8 · SELFPERSONHO · PHIL1162 · PHIL0015 · HUM10 · MODERNPHIL · PHIL21 · PHIL4 · 54 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you can handle some looseness and will participate and read.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyStudent-Designed SyllabusSuper NiceFlexible GradingDiscussion HeavySometimes Unorganized
  • Most students praise her warmth, humor, and .
  • Class often co-designs the syllabus and and flexible deadlines.
  • A minority flag disorganization, unclear assignments, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Easy to pass with show-up effort, but a true A , and pre-read paper drafts.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is accessible with lectures and discussion, though and thoughtful writing.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

as mandatory, but participation and presence clearly help grades.

All evidence is from in-person reviews only; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students strongly recommend her for kindness, fairness, and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Many call her flexible, a pushover on deadlines, and not a , though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload and papers depending on the course.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Warm, funny, and complaint about confusion and disorganization.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and sometimes class-chosen weightings.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, and often student-shaped, with mixed clarity on structure.

Main concern

Disorganization and structure.

What students said

“Jane does a great job of moderating the sensitive subjects we cover in her class and adds humor frequently. .”
PHIL2
“Jane is awesome! She lets the class create the syllabus and decide what we will be graded on.”
PHILO2
“Simple class. Watch selected movies write half a page or answer questions concerning the topic that week.”
PHIL50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often softened by group tests, class-chosen formats, easy quizzes, and flexible options.

Group TestsClass-Designed AssessmentsMultiple Choice MidtermEasy QuizzesDiscussion Final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and student-influenced test formats.

Group TestsClass-Designed AssessmentsMultiple Choice MidtermEasy QuizzesDiscussion Final
“The final and though so that was good!”
PHIL2
“Her quizzes are really easy, no surprises. and she allows students to have a ”
PHIL10
“multiple times the class convinced her to postpone due dates or make a ”
PHIL2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Jane does a great job of moderating the sensitive subjects we cover in her class and adds humor frequently. . Easy to pass, but if you want an A you will actually have to read and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting warmth, flexibility, and organization caveats. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ , and made the class interesting and fun!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“Fantastic teacher, probably the . ”

🧩 Flexible Structure

76/100

“She lets the class create the syllabus and decide what we will be graded on.”

⚠️ Organization Risk

40/100

“She is a . She is not very good at explaining things”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • adds humor frequently
  • made the class interesting and fun
  • thought-provoking lectures and debates
  • knows her stuff well enough

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy to pass, but if you want an A you will actually have to read
  • If you dont get An A its your fualt
  • Jane is really flexible and not a
  • Not a hard but not an easy A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • one of the
  • Love jane. Wonderful lady.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

54

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning 2005-2014 show rich detail and a mostly consistent positive core with a .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 534
4 out of 513
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHIL218 reviews
ETHICS3 reviews
PHIL103 reviews
PHIL303 reviews
PHIL022 reviews
Show 18 more courses
PHIL212 reviews
PHIL502 reviews
WORLDRELIGIONS2 reviews
HISTORYOFPHIL1 review
HUM101 review
MODERNPHIL1 review
P301 review
PHIL00151 review
PHIL11621 review
PHIL201 review
PHIL41 review
PHIL81 review
PHILETHI1 review
PHILETHICS1 review
PHILO101 review
PHILO21 review
PHILOSOPHY21 review
SELFPERSONHO1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1