AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Robert Buckenmeyer

PHIL50 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

if you want an interesting, low-workload philosophy class with minimal assignments.

Best fit · Easy A HunterBest Teacher EverLight AssignmentsStrange but InterestingEasy Philosophy
  • Students call him the him strange.
  • and very low difficulty ratings signal light load.
  • Both reviews rate quality at 4, but one has no written comment.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Low difficulty ratings and effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

Difficulty ratings of 1 and 2 plus sparse assignments mark the content as easy.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

One student calls him the ; both quality scores are solid 4s.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Easy difficulty and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Featherlight

92/100

Students report only two assignments per term.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Described as very interesting and the .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears centered on a tiny number of term assignments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person PHIL50 felt easy and memorable with and high praise for teaching.

Main concern

Personality is described as strange; limited recent detail.

What students said

“There were only two assignments per term. The !!”
PHIL50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize two assignments per term and .

Few Assignments

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments highlight sparse assignments rather than formal exams.

Two Assignments Per Term
“ .”
PHIL50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He was a very strange guy but very interesting!! . The BEST teacher I have ever had!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting light workload and high teaching praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“The !!”

🪶 Workload

92/100

“ .”

🎭 Personality

70/100

“He was a very strange guy but very interesting!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The !!
  • He was a very strange guy but very interesting!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Workload

  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Two older reviews with consistent quality scores help, but one has no comment and data is dated.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL502 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values