AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Annette Bartos

MATHD · MATH00D · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Proceed with caution; some love her support and partial credit, others found her ineffective.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPartial credit givenWants you to succeedMixed teaching abilityGroup activitiesRepeats examples
  • Two students praise kindness, partial credit, and repeated examples.
  • One strong review calls her the .
  • Experience seems highly inconsistent by student or term.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

Partial credit and re-submits help, but one student found the class extremely hard and poorly taught.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty ratings range from very easy to brutal depending on the reviewer.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Participation is graded via group activities, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Two strong yes votes clash with .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Multiple mentions of partial credit and chance to correct mistakes for more credit.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Quizzes and ; not described as crushing overall.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and fun; one student says she has no teaching ability at all.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and group activities.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

help and partial credit and a harsh claim of zero teaching ability.

Main concern

Teaching clarity may feel awful to some students despite kind demeanor.

What students said

“I can't believe how awful this teacher was. She has no teaching ability all. !”
MATHD
“Great teacher. She wants you to succeed! Teaches very well and gives good examples-a fun teacher.”
MATH00D
“Very kind and !”
MATHD

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and and resubmission for .

Quizzes and tests from textbook examplesPartial creditCorrections for extra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests cover text examples; she gives partial credit and lets students correct mistakes for more credit.

Quizzes and tests from textbook examplesPartial creditCorrections for extra credit
“Quizes and . She takes partial credit and lets you correct mistakes to turn back in for additional credit”
MATH00D

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She takes partial credit and lets you correct mistakes to turn back in for additional credit”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews with conflicting praise and harsh criticism. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

75/100

“Very kind and !”

🎯 Teaching Quality Split

58/100

“She has no teaching ability all. !”

❤️ Wants Students to Succeed

85/100

“Great teacher. She wants you to succeed!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teaches very well and gives good examples-a fun teacher.
  • Goes over and over problems.
  • She has no teaching ability all.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She takes partial credit and lets you correct mistakes to turn back in for additional credit
  • grades on participation, it was like high school all over again

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Three old reviews with sharply conflicting views reduce .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATHD2 reviews
MATH00D1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values