AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Michael Rahilly

PSYC30 · PSYCH30 · PSYCH1 · PSYC001 · PSYCH001 · PSYCH030 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Only take him if you can tolerate boring lectures and and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring lecturesEasy if you attendTangentsSlideshow teachingMixed feedback
  • Many students call lectures dry, slow, and full of off-topic talk.
  • Several say you can still get a decent grade or easy A by attending and using notes or study guides.
  • Feedback and grade return are inconsistent; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple reviews say easy A or good grades if you attend, use notes/powerpoints, and follow study guides, despite weak teaching.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is widely described as easy when you show up, though a minority finds tests and analysis demands harder.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

40/100

Grades are repeatedly tied to showing up and listening; formal policy is not stated but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

some call it easy and fine, many say boring or terrible and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Several students report easy As from attendance, notes, and personal-feeling papers; .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Book rarely opened; main , and exams with study guides.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Nice guy but lectures are boring, slow, tangent-heavy, and ; .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of exams, papers or essays, and lecture-based .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person psych lectures often feel dry and tangent-heavy, but a workable grade.

Main concern

, and delayed or missing grades and feedback.

What students said

“Easy A as long as you show up.”
PSYC001
“ . I still haven't been told what I ”
PSYCH30
“Read the notes and powerpoints, you will get an A!!!”
PSYC30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams reward class notes and study guides; .

Study guidesLecture and notes basedPapers and essays

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lecture knowledge; some students also write papers and essays.

Study guidesLecture notesPapers
“Pay attention to the and you will get good grades on the exams!”
PSYCH30
“you better know everything in & out so you can "annalyze the aspects" for tests and papers.”
PSYCH001

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A as long as you show up.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews, highlighting . Credibility rating: Medium.

😴 Lecture Experience

38/100

“This guy is terrible. He is BORING to listen to and talks very slow at times so its hard to stay awake.”

🅰️ Grade Accessibility

78/100

“Read the notes and powerpoints, you will get an A!!!”

🧭 Recommendation Split

42/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He likes talking a LOT. He gets distracted very easily
  • .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Easy A as long as you show up.
  • as long as you go to class you will get a decent grade.
  • I got an A attending everyday and by being emotional with my papers.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • . No clue where my grade is!!
  • I still haven't been told what I

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven older in-person reviews (2006-2010) with mixed but thematically consistent complaints about boredom and .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSYCH304 reviews
PSYCH0012 reviews
PSYCH0302 reviews
PSYC0011 review
PSYC301 review
Show 1 more courses
PSYCH11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values