AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jennifer Nguyen

MATH165 · MATH151 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
44.44%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want structured statistics instruction and can keep up with homework, but if you need quick help.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear step-by-step lecturesCaring but polarizingLecture heavyHeavy homework and testsMixed support outside class
  • Students and frustration with tone or help-seeking.
  • Getting an A is possible, but the , and tests.
  • Online reviews are much , and workload than in-person reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students earn A grades, but comments , and steady effort rather than an effortless A.

Online evidence includes stricter workload and no late work, while in-person evidence shows more A outcomes with and lecture notes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The statistics content is manageable when taught step by step, but several students say the , and .

In-person students more often say the class is understandable, while online students more often describe the course as unusually hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Only the as required, and there is little evidence of broad attendance flexibility.

Online evidence explicitly says attendance is required, while attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

53/100

Recommendations depend heavily on format and fit, because students either praise her clear teaching or strongly dislike her communication and classroom tone.

, while online reviews include repeated warnings about help, workload, and required attendance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades can be strong for students who keep up, but tough grader tags and .

Format shift

Online grading feels stricter because of no late work and , while .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and tests.

Format shift

Both formats report workload, but and tests as more stressful.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Her , while negative reviews describe poor responsiveness, discouraging tone, and difficulty asking questions.

Format shift

, while online teaching is hurt by communication and support complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and lectures without proving that exams alone dominate the grade.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize tests more, while and lecture notes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but while still noting long notes, homework, and an intimidating or discouraging tone.

Main concern

Students who need a warm question-friendly classroom may find her style discouraging.

What students said

“ and covers all the material with packets of notes you fill out together”
MATH165
“So ! The lectures are long, lots of note taking.”
MATH165

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized, with one very strong success story and several complaints , and no late work.

Main concern

Online students may struggle to get help quickly and keep up with homework and tests.

What students said

“taking online it's a bit harder to get help too.”
MATH165
“Online was lecture heavy and attending is a requirement.”
MATH165

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and pop quizzes, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

Tests MentionedPop Quizzes MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format beyond references to quizzes and homework.

Quizzes MentionedNo Clear Exam Policy
“ .”
MATH165

Online

Online reviews mention tests and pop quizzes but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Tests MentionedPop Quizzes MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ and tests”
MATH165
“Beware of pop quizzes”
MATH165

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and covers all the material with packets of notes you fill out together that are much easier to understand and absorb than the textbook.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“Professor Nguyen is a and step by step”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“So ! The lectures are long, lots of note taking.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

53/100

“ !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 Teaching Style

  • and covers all the material with packets of notes you fill out together
  • and easy to understand lecture, but .

Theme 2

📈 Difficulty and Grades

  • The class is not hard, just a lot of notes during the day
  • and tests and .

Theme 3

💬 Help and Tone

  • Very hard to ask questions during lecture, felt like she didn't want us to ask questions.
  • for help on problems I was stuck on.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The 18 reviews span several years, include both formats, and provide consistent detail about teaching clarity, workload, and communication.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH16516 reviews
MATH1512 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 1 · A 8 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 2 · B- 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values