AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Claudia Ramirez

MATH212 · MATH191 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

A strong choice if you can supplement lectures with practice and , and office hours.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLenient GraderNotes AllowedManageable HomeworkOffice Hour HelpSelf-Teaching Needed
  • Students often earn strong grades because , and notes are allowed on assessments.
  • , while others say lectures lack examples or require self-teaching.
  • Assessment risk is moderate because quizzes, tests, and finals matter heavily, but , and help.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A is realistic because allowed, and bonus or freebie questions appear in several reviews.

The lone online review and , though in-person Calc 2 still requires outside practice.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The math content, especially Calc 2 and Linear Algebra, is still real college math even though assignments and .

Online evidence says difficult material gets too little class time, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as strictly mandatory, but students say it helps because and examples are limited.

, while in-person evidence emphasizes paying attention and asking questions.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her because , and lenient, despite uneven lectures.

, while the single online review is positive but less enthusiastic.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Students repeatedly mention lenient grading, completion-based homework, bonus questions, freebie questions, and notes on assessments.

Format shift

Both online and in-person evidence support generous grading, with stronger detail from in-person reviews.

Workload

Light

78/100

and not excessive, though studying is still needed for math exams.

Format shift

Online work is called easy, while but , and finals.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

, and , but lectures can be dull, disorganized, or short on examples.

Format shift

Online evidence notes inefficient class time, while and weak lectures.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

, and finals, with homework usually supporting practice or completion credit.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize quizzes and exams and final weights.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

lectures can be dull or light on examples, requiring outside practice.

Main concern

Students may need to self-teach some concepts, especially in Calc 2.

What students said

“Be prepared to teach yourself some concepts.”
MATH191
“ .”
MATH212
“allows notes and cheat sheets on all assessments.”
MATH191

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review , and disorganized notes that make attendance useful.

Main concern

Class time may be inefficient and .

What students said

“ but she spends forever talking about the schedule every class & then doesn't spend time on difficult material.”
MATH191

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are test-heavy but student-friendly because she , and .

Two Pages Of Notes AllowedCheat Sheets AllowedSample ExamsBonus QuestionsRelevant To Homework

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews clearly support notes or cheat , and , but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules beyond allowed notes.

Two Pages Of Notes AllowedCheat Sheets AllowedSample ExamsExtra CreditHomework-Relevant Exams
“Allows two pages front and back of and exams.”
MATH212
“you are allowed 2 sheets of notes.”
MATH191
“allows notes and cheat sheets on all assessments.”
MATH191

Online

The online review mentions freebie quiz questions and easy homework, but it does not clearly .

Freebie Quiz QuestionsEasy HomeworkNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“ .”
MATH191

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“good person, ehh lecturer. grades very leniently and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

88/100

“grades very leniently and .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Calc 2 is a difficult course, but Prof. Ramirez is great during office hours.”

📝

82/100

“Allows two pages front and back of and exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The only math teacher that has ever taught me how to actually do math.
  • lectures are lackluster and you'll have to do a lot of learning outside of class.
  • rarely did example problems

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • She's not the greatest at keeping you engaged in class but she's an
  • , but she doesn't bombard you with questions like other math professors

Theme 3

🧪

  • Allows two pages front and back of and exams.
  • and is a
  • Tests and but she allows you 2 sheets of paper as a notecard.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The 12 reviews are recent and detailed, but one online review and mixed course levels limit certainty.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1919 reviews
MATH2123 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1