AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jesus Gutierrez

MA212MA211 · MA150 · MATH212 · MA210 · MATH191 · MATH211 · MATH210 · 162 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
45%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are strong at self-teaching math, can handle heavy homework, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderHomework heavyTest heavySelf-study requiredStrict deadlines
  • Reviews are sharply polarized, but recent comments heavily , and excessive workload.
  • Students repeatedly say the class requires major self-study because class time often focuses on homework questions instead of full lectures.
  • A smaller group likes his humor, passion, , and helpfulness when students stay on top of the work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Good grades are possible for prepared students, but many reviews , and strong exam performance.

Online and comments emphasizing long homework and recorded lectures.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The math , and often made harder by limited explanation and self-teaching expectations.

Both formats are challenging, while online students more often complain about organization and recorded lecture dependence.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

At least one review reports a mandatory class setting with strict absence limits, and many reviews describe rigid deadlines and .

The , while online reviews stress required meetings and inflexible exams.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most critical reviews warn against taking him because of , and .

Online reviews are more consistently negative, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students repeatedly describe picky grading, major deductions for , and unforgiving exam policies.

Format shift

Both formats report harsh grading, with online reviews especially frequent on nitpicky deductions.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

as massive, time-consuming, frequent, and paired with .

Format shift

Online reviews cite 10+ hours per week and long recorded lectures, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students find him passionate and funny, but many say he clearly and leaves students to teach themselves.

Format shift

Online teaching is criticized more strongly for recorded lectures and organization, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Reviews repeatedly report exams worth 60 to 85 percent of the , and homework as the main workload.

Format shift

Both formats are exam-heavy, with multiple online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed but still risky, with repeated , and homework load.

Main concern

Strict grading and .

What students said

“None of my classes with him had any lectures”
MATH210
“you are self-teaching yourself the material.”
MATH211
“Professor Gutierrez is great, he is funny & really cares about his students' success.”
MATH212

Remote format

Online

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing recorded , and limited live teaching.

Main concern

Students often say online sections require long self-study hours with .

What students said

“ .”
MATH210
“Tests are 75% of your grade despite the homework taking 10+ hours per week.”
MATH211
“it is very possible to ace this class.”
MA210

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam risk is high because reviews and little flexibility.

Exam HeavyStrict GradingNo CurveHard ExamsExact Method Required

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews , and exact-format grading, but do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book rules.

Weekly TestsHigh Exam WeightStrict Test DatesExact Format Required
“Tests every week worth 70% of your grade”
MATH211
“THE EXAM occupied more than 80 PERCENT!”
MA210
“does not give ANY exceptions for test dates”
MATH210

Online

Online reviews mention , and strict policies, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Exam HeavyHard ExamsStrict GradingNo CurveQuizzes
“exams are 80% of your grade”
MATH210
“His exams so hardddddd.”
MATH211
“grade is based 60% on exams”
MATH210

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“he only and you have to do all the learning on your own.”

⚖️

15/100

“Any little mistake would take a LOT off of my grade for that particular assignment”

🧪

18/100

“Tests every week worth 70% of your grade”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He doesn't care about his students and .
  • Pretty much youll be teaching yourself all semester since he doesnt actually lecture on the topics themselves
  • Great professor, teaches very well, gives a lot of homework though

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Homework packets twice a week with ~30 problems each, quiz every week.
  • if you are not willing to put up 2-4 hours a day just for homework and studying.
  • The

Theme 3

🧾 and Exams

  • He is a .
  • even missing a single symbol can result in .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

162

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty recent and detailed reviews across both formats provide strong evidence, though some comments are emotionally charged and polarized.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 581
4 out of 518
3 out of 511
2 out of 516
1 out of 537

Course coverage

MATH21015 reviews
MA21014 reviews
MATH21110 reviews
MATH2126 reviews
MA1502 reviews
Show 2 more courses
MA212MA2112 reviews
MATH1911 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 5 · A 7 · A- 3

B range

16

B+ 4 · B 12

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 4

D range

3

D+ 2 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1