AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sophia Lee

MATH191 · MATH33582 · MA191 · MATH150 · MATH175 · MATH190 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
98/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
95.83%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a caring math professor and are willing to keep up with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear supportive teachingHomework heavyGenerous improvement chancesCaring and encouragingActive group work
  • Students overwhelmingly praise Lee for feel manageable.
  • The , but students say it improves grades and understanding.
  • Grading , and opportunities.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

An A is very attainable because , but students still and stay engaged.

Online and in-person reviews both cite grade support, while .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The math content can be challenging, but , and group practice make it beginner friendly.

Online students call the class somewhat hard but clear, while feel easier.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as formally strict, but missing class can leave students behind because participation and board work matter.

In-person reviews provide most attendance evidence, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

because , and helps students succeed in math.

Both formats are highly positive, with stronger evidence from the larger in-person review set.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Students report , and removed exam material when topics are not covered well.

Format shift

Both formats show leniency, with the and .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

The main downside is frequent or though many students say it helps their grade.

Format shift

, but in-person reviews mention it more consistently.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe her as , and unusually effective at explaining math.

Format shift

Both formats strongly support excellent teaching, with work.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and exams, with homework carrying significant weight.

Format shift

Online reviews mention exams and , while and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students strongly praise her active, caring teaching style, but and the need to attend.

Main concern

and participation can catch students who fall behind.

What students said

“The but you can keep working on it all the way until the .”
MATH175
“Be prepared to work!”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students describe Lee as supportive, clear, and some math difficulty.

Main concern

The online math work still requires steady attention and .

What students said

“Although the class was a bit hard, she's easy to reach and her lectures and .”
MATH175
“I loved how she gave us and allowed us to improve our homework scores, even past the due date.”
MATH175

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear student friendly when described, especially because students mention Canvas tests, two tries, and chances.

Canvas ExamsTwo Exam TriesExtra CreditHomework Score Improvement

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and , but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policy.

Canvas ExamsTwo Exam TriesExtra Credit
“The and you got two tries.”
MATH175
“She gave opportunities after every exam”
MATH191

Online

Online reviews support student-friendly exams through two tries and homework score improvement, but .

Two Exam TriesHomework Score Improvement
“she gave us and allowed ”
MATH175

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Lee is a fantastic Pre-Calc teacher, and I understood what I was learning for once!”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Her lectures are so clear and I love the way she teaches.”

📚 Workload Reality

34/100

“The but you can keep working on it all the way until the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

97/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Made math seem easy. Perfect teaching.
  • and reasoning behind the math, not just forcing memory upon students.
  • She cares about her students and is so sweet.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but honestly, it helps your grade a lot.
  • Tons of !
  • The and you got two tries.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four reviews across many years are detailed, consistent, and strongly aligned in praise with repeated workload caveats.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1759 reviews
MATH1507 reviews
MATH1903 reviews
MA1912 reviews
MATH1912 reviews
Show 1 more courses
MATH335821 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 3 · A 10 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1