AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sheila White

MA150 · MAT131 · 150MATH · MATH170 · ALGEBRA2 · MATHS150 · ALG150 · MA175 · CALCULUS · MATH150 · MATH0150 · MATH175 · 193 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
19.51%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless you want a demanding math class, can follow exact procedures, and are ready for and strict grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy HomeworkStrict MethodsHigh Drop RiskPolarizing Personality
  • Most students warn that and answers can lose credit if work is not shown her exact way.
  • The workload is repeatedly described as heavy, with , and required practice.
  • A minority of students and transformative for highly disciplined learners, but the overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible for disciplined students, but , and accepting very strict grading.

, while online evidence is too negative and sparse to suggest an easier path.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The math is made harder by strict procedures, unclear explanations, heavy practice demands, and penalties for solving problems another way.

Both formats describe the course as difficult, with in-person reviews giving much .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

because students report sign-ins, restroom tracking, tardy penalties, participation pressure, and skip-class warnings.

, while online reviews only show that skipping class hurts success.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

because they view the , and classroom treatment as punitive.

Online reviews are fully negative, and group of students praising her rigor.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students repeatedly unless every step matches her preferred method exactly.

Format shift

, while online reviews mainly describe difficulty and poor teaching.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Reviews repeatedly mention tons of , and high time demands.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy work, with homework and long assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

A minority praise her clarity and rigor, but most describe confusing explanations, poor support, condescension, and self-teaching.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is very negative, while but still mostly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

The class appears driven by homework, quizzes, tests, and and quizzes carrying major risk.

Format shift

, and exact work requirements, while online reviews mention homework, tests, and group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, centered , and difficult classroom dynamics.

Main concern

Students repeatedly say correct answers lose credit unless the work matches her required method exactly.

What students said

“if you got the answer right she would mark it wrong if you didn't do the work the way she wanted you to.”
150MATH
“Her class is very difficult; she gives tons of .”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are uniformly negative, , and self-teaching.

Main concern

Online students felt unsupported and had to learn material independently.

What students said

“She honestly doesnt even explain properly, youre better off learning it yourself.”
CALCULUS
“She was incredibly rude constantly during the online classes.”
150MATH

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The because students report , and major point loss when work is not shown her exact way.

Strict Written Work RequirementsTest HeavyPop QuizzesMethod-Based GradingFrequent Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support strict method-based , and frequent quizzes, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring.

Strict Written Work RequirementsTest HeavyPop QuizzesFrequent Quizzes
“All my answers were correct but because i didn't do it her .”
MATH150
“ quizzes but double that.”
MA150

Online

Online reviews mention tests and heavy work, but do not clearly prove webcam rules, Lockdown Browser, open-book exams, .

Test HeavyHeavy Homework
“She was incredibly rude constantly during the online classes.”
150MATH
“She honestly doesnt even explain properly, youre better off learning it yourself.”
CALCULUS

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do not take her class. You may understand the material but if you don't show your work exactly like she .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

12/100

“You can get all the answers right on a quiz but if you don't solve the equations the way SHE .”

📚 Workload Pressure

15/100

“She will have 6 hw assignments due one day & have 40+ questions to do in each.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“She honestly doesnt even explain properly, youre better off learning it yourself.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • If you don't do the work the way she does it you will fail, doesn't matter if you understand the material.
  • I got a though all of the answers were correct.
  • Grades very strictly and even grades scratch work!

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Difficulty

  • If you're looking for an easy A without spending too much time outside of .
  • Her class is very difficult; she gives tons of .
  • This is a class you need to put the effort into.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Be ready if you pay attention and study hard.
  • She does not teach certain chapters and expects you to go to tutoring.
  • She constantly tells students to read the textbook even though .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

193

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across many years with , and high difficulty.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 524
4 out of 521
3 out of 530
2 out of 546
1 out of 572

Course coverage

MATH15013 reviews
150MATH12 reviews
MA1509 reviews
MATH01506 reviews
MATH1702 reviews
Show 8 more courses
1501 review
ALG1501 review
ALGEBRA21 review
CALCULUS1 review
MA1751 review
MAT1311 review
MATH1751 review
MATHS1501 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 3 · A 8

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 3 · C- 1

D range

4

D+ 2 · D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

13

Drop/Withdrawal 9 · Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1