AI Rate Professor

English

C.A Cross

ESL040 · ESL101 · ENG40 · ENGL099 · ESL053 · ENGLISH99 · ENG099 · ENG101 · ENG99 · ESL54 · ESL404653 · ESL53 · ESL100 · E101 · ESL40 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
11.11%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable with , and a highly inconsistent classroom experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganizedHarsh GradingLittle FeedbackMandatory AttendanceEnergetic but Inconsistent
  • Many students report , and .
  • Getting an A is described as difficult and sometimes dependent on favoritism rather than work quality.
  • Older positive reviews praise her energy and care, but recent reviews are strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A is described as very hard because , and several students feel grades depend on favoritism.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The course content is basic English or ESL material, but , and papers make it feel harder.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and that skipping class risks failing.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Recent students strongly discourage taking her because of , and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students repeatedly describe tough grading, low grades despite effort, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews mention many papers, lots of reading, frequent quizzes, tests, and homework.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

31/100

Some students praise her energy and care, but many describe her as , and unhelpful.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

, and tests rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe an energetic but , and inconsistent support.

Main concern

Students repeatedly , and grades that feel subjective.

What students said

“Never returns work, so .”
E101
“In this class, it is hard to get an A and in order to do so, she has to like you.”
ENG99
“I loved this class!”
ENG099

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and tests, but they do not clearly prove strict proctoring, open-book rules, or a .

Reading QuizzesTest HeavyStudy-Based Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, but exam rules are not clearly described.

Reading QuizzesTest Heavy
“There is reading and a ”
ENG099
“ as long as you study!”
ENG99

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do not want to take her any class anymore ! you .”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

31/100

“Has zero sense of organization ever.”

⚖️

15/100

“You have to be her favorites to get a good grade.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is not a
  • She is very funny and energetic.
  • Her , and she is more than willing to devote extra time to help her students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • In this class, it is hard to get an A and in order to do so, she has to like you.
  • but if the grammar isn't she won't bother to give you the point.
  • . I got a A easily.

Theme 3

📝 and Workload

  • Never returns work, so .
  • .
  • So many papers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 36 in-person reviews span many years and show consistent themes despite mixed sentiment.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 51
3 out of 59
2 out of 56
1 out of 59

Course coverage

E1017 reviews
ENG0995 reviews
ESL1005 reviews
ENG994 reviews
ENG1012 reviews
Show 10 more courses
ESL0402 reviews
ESL1012 reviews
ESL402 reviews
ENG401 review
ENGL0991 review
ENGLISH991 review
ESL0531 review
ESL4046531 review
ESL531 review
ESL541 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values