AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Dan Guo

MATH165 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take Dan Guo only if you can handle math independently and value cheat sheets and more than lecture clarity.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCheat Sheet ExamsExtra CreditKind But Mixed ClarityMath-HeavyPolarizing Experience
  • Students agree exams allow .
  • The experience depends heavily on comfort with math and ability to follow lectures.
  • One review praises kindness and , while another says understanding the lectures was difficult.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

An A is realistic with work, cheat sheets, and , but weak math students may struggle a lot.

All evidence comes from in-person Math165 reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content appears challenging for non-math students even though one student found it manageable with effort.

, and they conflict on how hard the class feels.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

The in-person , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split because kindness and help, but lecture clarity can make the class .

All and is evenly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

and lots of suggest grading support despite one difficult experience.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is not described as overwhelming, but students still need to put in steady work.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching quality is mixed because one student found the accent hard to understand while another praised her as kind and helpful.

Format shift

, and they show a polarized teaching experience.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Reviews emphasize exams and cheat sheets more than assignments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

difficult experience and a kind, workable class with .

Main concern

Lecture clarity may be a serious issue for students who are not already strong in math.

What students said

“It was really hard getting by in the class, ESPECIALLY if you're not a math type of person.”
Math165
“Her class is not hard if you put in the work.”
Math165

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are student-friendly because students can use a cheat sheet, but the reviews .

Cheat Sheet Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book status, proctoring, midterm format, or .

Cheat Sheet Exams
“Yes, you could use a .”
Math165
“You can bring a !”
Math165

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Her class is not hard if you put in the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“her accent made it genuinely difficult to understand the things she would say.”

📈 Grade Support

60/100

“She gave us a lot of .”

📝

85/100

“You can bring a !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Clarity

  • her accent made it genuinely difficult to understand the things she would say.
  • Great teacher! Her class is not hard if you put in the work.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It was really hard getting by in the class, ESPECIALLY if you're not a math type of person.
  • She gave us a lot of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, and they strongly conflict despite both covering the same course format.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

Math1652 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values