AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Robert Chen

MA150 · MATH025 · MAT210 · MATH020 · PRECALC · MATH175 · MATH190 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
67.57%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you will attend, practice consistently, and use and help resources.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and approachableExtra credit supportFair exam reviewsTest heavyMixed for beginners
  • Most students praise Chen as caring, funny, and willing to help.
  • Grades can be very attainable , and .
  • Negative , and insufficient guidance for weaker math students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

73/100

An A is realistic with , and , but the class is not effortless.

and fair preparation, while online evidence is more mixed on exam alignment.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Calculus content remains demanding, but many students say and review materials make it manageable.

, while online students more often mention unclear alignment between lectures and exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as formally mandatory, but many comments warn that skipping makes the course much harder.

The attendance evidence mainly comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and fair opportunities, though struggling students sometimes report serious difficulty.

, while online reviews are split between praise and warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

He often gives partial credit, cheat sheets, dropped or , and , though some students still call him tough.

Format shift

, while online reviews include complaints about no partial credit and .

Workload

Moderate

53/100

, and STEM center work require steady effort but are usually described as manageable.

Format shift

Both formats mention homework and tests, but online complaints .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most reviews describe him as , and helpful, while a smaller group says his lectures lack enough guidance.

Format shift

, while online teaching feedback is more inconsistent.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Comments repeatedly emphasize tests, exam reviews, finals, and .

Format shift

Both formats describe test-heavy assessment, and and showing work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, , and useful exam preparation, with a minority reporting hard tests and weak guidance.

Main concern

Students who need step-by-step instruction may find the .

What students said

“ , so if you get the review down, you're set!”
MATH190
“Do the work and you'll do well!”
MATH190
“Exams are so hard and not aligned with his lecture at all.”
MATH190

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with one strong recommendation and and .

Main concern

Online students may need to prepare independently because lectures and .

What students said

“ and and must show work.”
MATH190
“ all.”
MATH190

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are important and sometimes hard, but , and review materials that make them fair.

Exam Reviews Similar To ExamsHalf Page Cheat SheetPartial CreditTest HeavyPaper Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but often fair exam structure with similar reviews, partial credit, cheat sheets, and some hard-test complaints.

Exam Reviews Similar To ExamsHalf Page Cheat SheetPartial CreditTest Heavy
“ ”
MATH190
“ and allows half page cheat sheets as well.”
MATH190
“ and he tries to challenge the students”
MATH175

Online

Online reviews mention paper exams , and complaints that lectures and homework did not clearly match exams.

Paper ExamsShow Work RequiredEvening Exam TimesTest Heavy
“ and must show work.”
MATH190
“the times for the exams they were like 7-9pm on Wednesday's”
MATH190
“ all.”
MATH190

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do the work and you'll do well!”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“He is good at teaching and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“ .”

⚖️

74/100

“ and allows half page cheat sheets as well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is very passionate about Calculus, teaching and his students.
  • .
  • his teaching teaching style lets you work out the problem rather .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do the work and you'll do well!
  • He gives you if you have a certain amount of hours in the stem center
  • The

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • and not too long and .
  • all.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 37 reviews across many years with detailed and mostly consistent themes, despite some polarized experiences.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH19025 reviews
MATH1755 reviews
MA1502 reviews
MATH0202 reviews
MAT2101 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH0251 review
PRECALC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 3 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 4 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 4