AI Rate Professor

English

Amy Durfield

ENGL103 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Avoid Durfield unless you must take the course and are comfortable managing and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh feedbackUnclear improvementInconsistent rubricsTough graderAvoid if possible
  • The only review is strongly negative and unless necessary.
  • The and .
  • Rubrics and rules are described as .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The student earned a B but and inconsistent rules, so an A and high tolerance for ambiguity.

All evidence comes from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content itself is not clearly described as difficult, but and .

Only online evidence exists, and it focuses on grading clarity rather than course content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Only one online review exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

The only student review explicitly because , and rules feel unfair.

All recommendation evidence is from one online review, and there is no in-person evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

The review directly describes harsh feedback and says disagreements .

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, with .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The review does not describe workload volume, so workload cannot be judged beyond normal course expectations.

Format shift

Only one online review exists, and .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

The teaching experience appears poor because the student reports unclear improvement guidance and inconsistent rules.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and it is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

The review tag says the course is test heavy, but the comment itself does not detail the assessment structure.

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and assessment evidence is limited to the supplied tag.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review describes a harsh and .

Main concern

The main concern .

What students said

“ , and she is not clear on things to improve.”
ENGL-103
“ and rules because they're inconsistent.”
ENGL-103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk appears strict because the review is tagged test heavy, but the comments do .

Test heavy tagNo clear proctoring evidenceNo clear open-book evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

, but reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or final policies.

Test heavy tagNo clear proctoring evidenceNo clear exam format evidence

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unless you really need to take this teacher's course .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

10/100

“Unless you really need to take this teacher's course .”

📝

32/100

“ , and she is not clear on things to improve.”

⚖️

18/100

“ and rules because they're inconsistent.”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Recommendation

  • Unless you really need to take this teacher's course .
  • and rules because they're inconsistent.

Theme 2

📝 And Grading

  • , and she is not clear on things to improve.
  • If you disagree with her agenda she will take it upon herself to mark you off as much as she can.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, one format, and .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL-1031 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values