AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cristian Martinez

MATH165 · MA162 · MATH162 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

He is a strong choice for students who want a patient math professor with fair work and helpful support.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring and approachableFlexible deadlinesMultiple exam attemptsHelpful lecturesBudget friendly
  • Students strongly praise his caring and accommodating style.
  • Homework and .
  • The main weakness is limited course management clarity in one older in-person review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students report , and multiple exam attempts.

Online evidence is especially lenient with no homework due dates before exams, while and tests.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Math still requires work, but students say the class is passable and .

Online and in-person reviews both support a beginner-friendly experience, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Participation matters and one review warns skipping hurts, but and accommodation.

Online reviews emphasize flexible homework timing, while .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Most students recommend him because , and .

Both formats are positive, with the single online review especially enthusiastic and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

86/100

Multiple attempts, extensions, and .

Format shift

attempts, while in-person grading is still lenient but more structured.

Workload

Light

76/100

but described as reasonable, flexible, and not hard.

Format shift

Online homework has no fixed deadline before exams, while .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students consistently describe him as caring, helpful, and and Canvas use.

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both praise his support, while the main negative .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and a final rather than one dominant category.

Format shift

Online mentions exams and homework, while , and a final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews mostly describe a and exams, though one student disliked his organization.

Main concern

The main concern is occasional organization and progress-tracking issues.

What students said

“ .”
MA162
“He and 3 tests.”
MATH165
“ , so it was difficult to see my progress in class.”
MATH165

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online review praises , and multiple exam attempts.

Main concern

The main concern is that students still need .

What students said

“Allows you 2 chances and .”
MATH162
“No due date on HW as .”
MATH162

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as manageable and sometimes allow multiple attempts, but reviews .

Multiple Exam AttemptsFinal Retake ChanceManageable ExamsReviews do not clearly prove proctoring

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, with one review saying exams were not hard, but they do not clearly prove exam rules.

Manageable ExamsTwo Exams and FinalReviews do not clearly prove exam format
“ .”
MA162
“Hw is due every Sunday but he typically gives extensions on it, one quiz, 2 exams, and the final.”
MATH162

Online

The online review says students , but it does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, or open-book rules.

Multiple Exam AttemptsFinal Retake ChanceReviews do not clearly prove proctoring
“Allows you 2 chances and .”
MATH162

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are not confident or struggle in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting support, grading flexibility, workload, and organization themes; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“He does his best to make sure everyone is on the same page.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“One of the few professors Ive had that genuinely cares for his students!”

⚖️

86/100

“Allows you 2 chances and .”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • Such a sweet and caring professor!
  • Hes the sweetest and genuinely cares for his students!
  • He is a and willing to help those in need.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The class should be very passable as long as you complete your work.
  • .
  • No due date on HW as .

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization

  • , so it was difficult to see my progress in class.
  • In the beginning, he wouldn't use good examples to write in our notes, he got better at that towards the middle of the semester.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews give useful but limited evidence, with mostly consistent praise and one strong negative older review.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1623 reviews
MA1621 review
MATH1651 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1