AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jerica Sterling

MATH165 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
85/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a and are willing to do steady work for real understanding.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringClear notesHeavy workloadOrganized systemStraightforward exams
  • Students strongly , and accessibility.
  • The class has a , and Canvas submissions.
  • Grades are achievable for students who keep up, but this is not an effortless math class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades can be earned with consistent work and some , but the workload keeps it from being an easy A.

Online reviews mention and straightforward exams, while the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The math content is manageable because notes and , but students still need sustained practice.

Online evidence highlights flexible video lectures, while in-person evidence emphasizes structured learning through guided notes and classwork.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters and classwork is part of the system, but reviews do not prove a .

Online and in-person reviews both mention participation-related work, but .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

because , and helpful despite the workload.

Both formats are positive, with online reviews giving slightly stronger evidence for accessibility and lecture flexibility.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and correction opportunities help, but the C grade and .

Format shift

Online reviews suggest fair support and , while the A.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly describe lots of , and tedious Canvas input.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work, with online evidence naming homework packages and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students describe her as , and effective at helping them learn math.

Format shift

Both formats strongly support excellent teaching, though the sample is small.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

The class uses , and exams rather than relying on one assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes and exams plus homework, while the , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The but tedious system with lots of work and strong learning payoff.

Main concern

Canvas input and class requirements can feel tedious and work-heavy.

What students said

“A lot of work, but you will learn the material.”
MATH165

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and straightforward quizzes and exams despite heavy work.

Main concern

The online workload can be heavy with , and class work.

What students said

“Video lectures, so you can watch faster or slower.”
MATH165
“the workload is heavy but it will help you better understand the material.”
MATH165

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited but and exams without surprise content.

Straightforward QuizzesStraightforward ExamsNo Surprise Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The but does not clearly prove format, proctoring, open-book status, or difficulty.

Exams
“Classwork in class, exams, everything needs ”
MATH165

Online

Online reviews say quizzes and exams are straightforward, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Straightforward QuizzesStraightforward ExamsNo Surprise Exams
“Quizzes and ”
MATH165

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A lot of work, but you will learn the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and assessment. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“the workload is heavy but it will help you better understand the material.”

👍 Recommendation Level

92/100

“ . 10/10.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Video lectures, so you can watch faster or slower.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Work And Grades

  • For each section, she assigns a workbook, a and class work
  • A lot of work, but you will learn the material.
  • Quizzes and

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Very caring.
  • Helped solve harassment issue.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews provide consistent but limited evidence, so confidence is reduced despite detailed comments.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1653 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values