AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kevin Punsalan

MATH165 · MATH115 · MATH962 · MATH065 · MATH102 · MATH0952 · MATH30 · MATH162 · MATH190 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
85/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
73.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you will attend, do the homework, and use office or STEM center help, especially because the online version is notably easier.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear explanationsLots of homeworkAccessible for helpFair partial creditAttendance matters
  • Online MATH162 is much easier and more grade-friendly than the in-person math courses.
  • , and help-seeking to do well.
  • Most students praise his patience and feedback, but a few find lectures dull or support hard to access.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Online sections look like an easy A, but , and asking for help.

Online evidence is much easier and more forgiving, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The math itself often gets harder over time, but and support make it manageable.

Online MATH162 is described as easy, while as harder and homework-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

, but many comments say skipping class makes passing unlikely.

In-person reviews strongly stress attendance, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and , though some warn that support and lecture style vary.

Online reviews are strongly positive, while but more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

He gives partial credit, test corrections, dropped scores, and , but does not always offer .

Format shift

, while and effort-based.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, though online homework is described as short and manageable.

Format shift

Online workload is light to moderate, while .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students , and helpful, despite a few complaints about dull lectures or limited availability.

Format shift

Online students praise clarity and structure, while and occasional frustration.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and finals, with some sections described as test-heavy.

Format shift

Online reviews clearly mention weekly homework, quizzes, tests, and a final, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but homework-heavy class where attendance and active effort matter.

Main concern

Lots of homework and missed classes can quickly hurt grades.

What students said

“If you are a working adult, this class is difficult to maintain lots of HW.”
MATH065
“Lots of but it helped me learn.”
MATH0952

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews describe a very doable class with short , and retakes.

Main concern

The course , and a final.

What students said

“Pretty easy A, everything is self explanatory”
MATH162
“ . 3 test & 1 final. .”
MATH162

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence shows standard quizzes, tests, and , but no clear proctoring or open-book policy.

QuizzesTestsFinal ExamRetakes In Online SectionTest Corrections In Some In-Person Sections

Assessment risk

Standard

64/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and partial credit, but do not clearly prove closed-book exams or strict proctoring.

Pop QuizzesTestsTest CorrectionsPartial Credit
“Let us do test corrections to get 10% more on the test”
MATH190
“ if you have the right train of thought.”
MATH0952

Online

Online , and two attempts, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesThree TestsFinal ExamTwo AttemptsDropped Lowest Scores
“3 test & 1 final. .”
MATH162
“ couple of questions”
MATH162

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You'll pass if you get help and work hard.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ and he actually cares.”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“Lots of homework but overall great class, great professor”

📈 Grade Path

68/100

“You'll pass if you get help and work hard.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Good math teacher. .
  • Very knowledgeable and .
  • He was an excellent prof. Often stayed behind to assist

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • DUE THE HW! It will make or break your grade, he assigns a lot.
  • Lots of but it helped me learn.
  • Not that .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • Pretty easy A, everything is self explanatory
  • Gives partial credit for answers where you and tests, even if wrong.
  • Let us do test corrections to get 10% more on the test

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews across several years and courses give consistent evidence on teaching, workload, and format differences.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1654 reviews
MATH1623 reviews
MATH9622 reviews
MATH0651 review
MATH09521 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH1021 review
MATH1151 review
MATH1901 review
MATH301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values