AI Rate Professor

Biology

Kalimba Harris

BIOL32622 · BIO105 · BIOL2160 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-taught experienceTough gradingConfusing lecturesRandom exam questionsPoor organization
  • Most students describe the class as , and .
  • Grades can still be high for some students, but students report , and random test questions.
  • Recommendation is very low because students feel unsupported and frustrated.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments , and a self-taught path to success.

and mismatched quizzes, while in-person reviews stress self-teaching and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The content may not be inherently impossible, but , and weak alignment make it feel difficult.

Both formats describe confusion, with and in-person reviews emphasizing unsupported self-teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

and class disruption signals, but do not clearly prove a .

, though in-person and online reviews both mention quiz pressure.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Most students would not take her again because they , and lack of support.

Both formats are mostly negative, with as the main exception.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough grader and , and .

Format shift

Online reviews give stronger evidence of , while and exam errors.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

The workload feels heavy because students , and manage poorly aligned assessments.

Format shift

Online workload is complicated by unclear labs and software, while , and papers.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

Most reviews describe unclear, disorganized, unsupported teaching that leaves students confused or self-taught.

Format shift

Both formats are negative, with online reviews especially criticizing lecture organization and technology use.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and lab quizzes more than assignments, with several complaints about alignment.

Format shift

Online reviews mention lab quizzes and , while , and pop quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews also skew negative, with students citing , and lack of support.

Main concern

, and students feel disconnected from the instructor.

What students said

“A majority of , and I hardly ever needed help from her.”
BIO105
“ .”
BIO105
“ .”
BIO105

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing confusing labs, , and weak support.

Main concern

Students report , and assignments or quizzes that do not match instruction.

What students said

“Quiz's sometimes didn't match the .”
BIOL32622
“Her lectures are a shotgun of ideas that are very difficult to connect because it all comes in a random order.”
BIOL2160
“Makes so many mistakes on correcting that even right answers are considered wrong.”
BIO105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are risky because students report , and questions not clearly taught.

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyTough GradingMismatched QuestionsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

quizzes, and exam errors, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyUncovered Exam QuestionsExam Errors
“ .”
BIO105
“Makes so many errors even in exams.”
BIO105
“Please put everything away.”
BIO105

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes that sometimes did not match labs and grading mistakes, but do not clearly .

Lab QuizzesMismatched QuestionsGrading MistakesNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Quiz's sometimes didn't match the .”
BIOL32622
“Makes so many mistakes on correcting that even right answers are considered wrong.”
BIO105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“A majority of , and I hardly ever needed help from her.”

⚖️

20/100

“Makes so many mistakes on correcting that even right answers are considered wrong.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

15/100

“I got a A but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are a shotgun of ideas that are very difficult to connect because it all comes in a random order.
  • she's not great at teaching - seemed and very unsure of herself.
  • No inspiration to teach or wanting you to learn.

Theme 2

📈 About Exams and Grades

  • Quiz's sometimes didn't match the .
  • .
  • Makes so many errors even in exams.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • .
  • A majority of , and I hardly ever needed help from her.
  • She gets defensive about any issues i had brought up to her.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across online and and mostly consistent, despite a small sample size.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

BIO1056 reviews
BIOL21601 review
BIOL326221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values