AI Rate Professor

English

Sally Olivas

ENGL103 · ENG103 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you want a demanding writing class and can follow detailed .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy Paper LoadUnclear DirectionsParticipation RequiredPassionate But Stern
  • and many papers.
  • Positive reviews say she is passionate, structured, and .
  • The main risk is high effort with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students report harsh grading, no rounding, no , and heavy paper expectations.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The writing content is manageable for strong students, but and strict paper standards make the course challenging.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Attendance and preparation appear strict because one student says missing reading materials can get you kicked out and marked absent.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most detailed comments warn against taking her because the , and communication feel stressful.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

, and always having work to do.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students praise her passion and feedback, but , and an intimidating style.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments , and research writing rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a demanding writing professor with , and mixed teaching clarity.

Main concern

The biggest concern is harsh grading with .

What students said

“ ; margins, font size, spacing, punctuation.”
ENG101
“The .”
ENGL101
“She gives a steady workload, but it's not bad if you're not a slacker.”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the exam style.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation, but they do not clearly prove any exam policy.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“SO MANY PAPERS”
ENGL101
“Participation matters”
ENGL101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Worked my butt off in this class. I have consistently taken days off work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She knows what she wants, but doesnt convey that to students.”

⚖️

18/100

“She grades very harshly.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“you will always be working on something.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is always on task.
  • She's passionate about the subject and listens to her students.
  • She's very in class and very intimidating.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • ; margins, font size, spacing, punctuation.
  • The only downsides are no and she does not round grades.
  • If you want a challenge and a .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • So many papers
  • She does give a lot of work, but and gives a .
  • , but there is no lack of work...you will always be working on something.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 14 reviews across many years show a consistent pattern of , and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGL1018 reviews
ENG1013 reviews
ENG1032 reviews
ENGL1031 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values