AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

An Do

MA191 · MA162 · MATH191 · MATH162 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Take her only if you can handle , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerFast LecturesTough GraderTest HeavyWeekly HomeworkResponsive By Email
  • Students are split, with some praising support and feedback while .
  • Many reviews , and weekly homework.
  • Online reviews are more positive than in-person reviews, which contain most of the harsh criticism.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A requires sustained work because , and limited curves or makeups.

Online reviews sound fairer and include , while and no curves.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Calculus content is made harder by fast pacing and .

Online reviews are more manageable, but in-person reviews repeatedly describe rushed or .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and in-person comments, though one online review says arrangements may be possible.

Online attendance has some flexibility for arrangements, while and passing.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Recommendation depends on student fit because support and , but many students report rushed teaching and .

Online reviewers are more positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Multiple reviews call her a tough or , and few extra-credit options in some sections.

Format shift

Online comments describe grading as fair, but .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload is heavy because students , and several exams.

Format shift

Both formats mention steady work, with online reviews listing weekly assignments and and class worksheets.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

She is responsive and sometimes helpful, but many students say lectures are rushed or hard to understand.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is more positive, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Assessment is exam-heavy, with , and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention four exams including the final, while and quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed to negative, with repeated complaints , and .

Main concern

Students often felt the pace was too fast and the .

What students said

“She went through her lectures too quickly and did not give us confidence.”
MATH191
“ and quizzes.”
MATH162
“ as many points away as .”
MATH162

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are more favorable, describing clear expectations, , and some .

Main concern

The online class , and exams.

What students said

“ , but she's willing to make arrangements with you if you're unable to attend.”
MATH191
“The class consists of weekly assignments, quizzes, 4 exams (including final) & provides .”
MATH191
“if you work hard and study material you should be able to pass”
MATH162

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe an and , but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Four Exams Including FinalQuizzesTest HeavyStrict GradingNo Curves Mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, strict grading, and no curves or makeups in one section.

Test HeavyExams And QuizzesStrict GradingNo Curves
“Test heavy”
MATH191
“ and quizzes.”
MATH162
“No or make ups. .”
MATH162

Online

Online reviews mention weekly assignments, quizzes, four exams including the final, and , but .

Weekly AssignmentsQuizzesFour Exams Including FinalExtra Credit
“The class consists of weekly assignments, quizzes, 4 exams (including final) & provides .”
MATH191

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Talks really fast. as many points away as .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“She went through her lectures too quickly and did not give us confidence.”

⚖️

25/100

“ as many points away as .”

👍 Recommendation Fit

43/100

“I'll definitely be looking for her at CPP. <3”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She went through her lectures too quickly and did not give us confidence.
  • She .
  • Her teaching style included doing examples throughout class, while walking around the room to provide one-on-one help.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and quizzes.
  • No or make ups. .
  • if you work hard and study material you should be able to pass

Theme 3

📚

  • The class consists of weekly assignments, quizzes, 4 exams (including final) & provides .
  • .
  • Work sheets due at the end of every class which counts as attendance.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across online and in-person formats provide detailed, , and exams.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1623 reviews
MATH1912 reviews
MA1621 review
MA1911 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1