AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rebecca Younathan

MAT1051 · MATH1051 · MATH30 · STA1200 · MATH61 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take her in person if you are diligent and want structure, but .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLots of homeworkAttendance mattersHelpful in personPoor online supportTough grader
  • In-person students often praise her support, humor, and willingness to help outside class.
  • The online review is sharply negative and reports weak explanations and .
  • Students describe the workload as , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Grades are possible, but students repeatedly say success requires attending lecture, doing lots of homework, and taking the class seriously.

In-person evidence shows hard work can pay off, while the single .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Students describe algebra and statistics as hard, with .

In-person reviews emphasize challenging but manageable content, while the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

to pass or understand the work.

Attendance pressure is supported by in-person reviews, while the online review .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

but not for students needing a strong online instructor.

In-person reviews are mostly favorable, while the only online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Tags and comments mention and hard courses, though motivated students can still earn solid grades.

Format shift

Strict-grading evidence comes mainly from in-person math reviews, with .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of understand the material.

Format shift

and the online review also tags the course as so many papers.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

In-person teaching is often praised, but the online review and .

Format shift

Teaching appears much stronger in person than online.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Comments mention , so assessment appears assignment-heavy but .

Format shift

and tests, while online assessment details are not clearly proven.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly positive for students who attend, do the homework, and use her help.

Main concern

The class involves a lot of homework and students say skipping lecture hurts performance.

What students said

“There is a LOT of homework but it is necessary in .”
STA1200
“You need to go to lecture if you want to pass because she clears up stuff I couldnt figure out on my own.”
MATH30
“College algebra has been super hard, but if be passing right now (1052).”
MAT1051

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is very negative and says lessons were poorly explained with .

Main concern

The student and .

What students said

“She was a poor teacher, didn't explain lessons and would say in her 10 minute video lectures, " ".”
MATH61
“I have sent various emails and have never got 1 back.”
MATH61

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, take-home, midterm, or .

Test HeavyExam Format Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove the .

Test Heavy
“sucks at explaining the chapters”
MATH1051

Online

The online review does not clearly prove any exam policy, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Stats isnt really an easy class , but Miss Y makes it manageable and gives you various resources to help.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

Teaching Split

62/100

“Stats isnt really an easy class , but Miss Y makes it manageable and gives you various resources to help.”

Workload

25/100

“There is a LOT of homework but it is necessary in .”

Online Risk

30/100

“She was a poor teacher, didn't explain lessons and would say in her 10 minute video lectures, " ".”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • She makes stats fun even when the material isn't.
  • Always cracked jokes with class.
  • sucks at explaining the chapters

Theme 2

Workload And Attendance

  • There is a LOT of homework but it is necessary in .
  • You need to go to lecture if you want to pass because she clears up stuff I couldnt figure out on my own.
  • .

Theme 3

Online Experience

  • She was a
  • I have sent various emails and have never got 1 back.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews are recent enough and format-specific, but the online judgment rests on only one review.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

STA12002 reviews
MAT10511 review
MATH10511 review
MATH301 review
MATH611 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1