AI Rate Professor

English

Sarah Muehlmann

ENG101 · ENGL101 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a and are willing to read, discuss, and revise your writing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGives strong essay feedbackCaring and accessibleReading heavyPassionate lecturesParticipation matters
  • , and passion for literature.
  • The , and multiple essays rather than effortless completion.
  • Most students recommend her, but a few criticize organization and class cancellations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Several students earned A grades, but the , and essays as real work for the grade.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The content is manageable for English 101 but , and discussion expectations.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews , but participation in discussions is repeatedly described as important.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend her because , and makes literature engaging.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grading seems fair rather than automatic, with and several A outcomes but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The course has repeated reading and several essays, but students do not describe the workload as overwhelming.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Students mostly describe her as passionate, caring, helpful, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades , and a research paper rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe a and writing.

Main concern

The main concern is reading and .

What students said

“ and genuinely cares about her students.”
ENGL101
“Although the course is heavy on reading, it was an overall very interesting course.”
ENG101
“There is a lot of reading in her class but she goes over the stories.”
ENGL101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The one section and that the midterm and final were not made to be hard in another.

No MidtermEssay FinalExams Not Hard

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

in one section, and not-hard midterm and final in another.

No MidtermEssay FinalExams Not Hard
“ . .”
ENG101
“The midterm and .”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Muehlmann is a gem. She inspires you to want to write.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“ and went above and beyond to help me through the class.”

📚 Workload Reality

45/100

“Although the course is heavy on reading, it was an overall very interesting course.”

👍 Recommendation Level

78/100

“ enjoy reading!”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are fantastic she really knows her literature and it is obvious that she loves her field.
  • and is willing to make time to help you improve.

Theme 2

📚 About Reading And Writing

  • The class is not the easiest but as long as you read, pay attention, participate in .
  • and a research paper.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • and genuinely cares about her students.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 11 in-person reviews span several years and repeatedly mention the same themes of , and essays.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1016 reviews
ENGL1015 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 6

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values