AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Javier Ramirez

MATH165 · MATH040 · ECON238 · MATH31 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
23/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you are ready to use tutoring and outside resources when lectures do not make sense.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear ExplanationsTutoring NeededPop QuizzesAttendance MattersMixed Experience
  • Three of and .
  • One positive review says he helps students and .
  • , and quizzes appear important to staying on track.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible in at least one course, but most , and outside study.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The material becomes challenging because students say and problems are .

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because comments say participation matters and skipping class hurts your chance to pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students do not recommend him because .

, and they lean negative despite one positive experience.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

A , and reports of many low grades point to strict outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

, and attendance matter, but the workload is not consistently described as overwhelming.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

, and needing outside videos or tutoring to understand concepts.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and tests, suggesting a mix of assignments and exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, mistakes, and a need for tutoring, with one strong positive review about helpfulness.

Main concern

and need outside help.

What students said

“Nothing during the and frustrated.”
MATH165
“go to tutoring if you really want to understand what he is trying to teach you”
ECON238
“He is happy to help if you are lost and .”
MATH040

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, pop quizzes, and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesPop QuizzesTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and test-heavy assessment, but and book policy are not clearly proven.

Weekly QuizzesPop QuizzesTest Heavy
“ .”
MATH040
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
MATH31
“TEST HEAVY”
MATH31

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nothing during the and frustrated.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity, outside support, and assessments. Credibility rating: Medium.

Teaching Quality

32/100

“Not very good at explaining the material and he makes errors more than a professor should”

Recommendation Rate

30/100

“ ”

Workload and Quizzes

50/100

“ .”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • He's not very clear and .
  • he is an instructor that has the tendency to work out the problems in his head then put the answer on the board
  • He is happy to help if you are lost and .

Theme 2

Difficulty and Support

  • go to tutoring if you really want to understand what he is trying to teach you
  • Allows some time in class .
  • considering more than half the class had Ds or Fs

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

but include one strongly positive outlier and limited grade data.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ECON2381 review
MATH0401 review
MATH1651 review
MATH311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values