AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Shamsul Arefin

MAT12 · MA150 · MATH30 · MATH150 · MATH190 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless you can teach yourself math and tolerate .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesDisorganized pacingHard to understandQuestion brushingTest heavy
  • All five reviews rate the teaching experience extremely poorly and warn students away.
  • Students , and sometimes incorrect.
  • The course does not look like an easy A despite one reported A, because students , and withdrawals.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Even with one reported A, the class appears costly because students report confusion, withdrawals, lots of homework, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

26/100

The math content is , and unclear lectures.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

A rating tag says skipping class means you .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

Students because his teaching is confusing, disorganized, and hard to understand.

All , and it is uniformly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

because reviews mention withdrawals, tests, homework, and difficulty understanding what is expected.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

One review tags lots of homework and test-heavy work, and several students describe the course as demanding because of poor instruction.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students repeatedly describe the lectures as , and sometimes based on misunderstood material.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

The clearest assessment evidence is a test-heavy tag, with formula sheets and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are uniformly negative, citing confusing explanations, disorganization, and poor handling of questions.

Main concern

Students say and often makes the material harder to understand.

What students said

“the way he conveys information and lectures to the .”
MA150
“ !”
MATH30
“If you want to make stats even harder ”
MAT12

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest a , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, or closed-book policies.

Test HeavyFormula SheetsReviews do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and formula sheets but do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy.

Test HeavyFormula Sheets
“LOTS OF HOMEWORK”
MATH150
“TEST HEAVY”
MATH150
“He gives formula sheets and expects everyone to understand everything immediately.”
MATH190

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“the way he conveys information and lectures to the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

3/100

“ .”

📈 Difficulty & Cost

30/100

“If you want to make stats even harder ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and is rude when you ask questions about material.
  • He did not even know the material half the time.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Class started with 20+ people then to 10.
  • If you want to make stats even harder
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Concerns

  • Brushes off questions, ignores concerns.
  • he would often change his answers after realizing he did something wrong
  • his accent gets in the way of his teaching I can't understand him well either.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed reviews across several courses are recent enough for the dataset and are highly consistent in negative tone.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MA1501 review
MAT121 review
MATH1501 review
MATH1901 review
MATH301 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2