AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Edward Pang

MATH191CALC2 · MATH165 · MATH191 · MA175 · MATH151 · MATH175 · MA191 · MAT165 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a structured and study guides reliably pays off.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStudy Guide DrivenClear Exam PrepLecture HeavyParticipation MattersCaring Math Teacher
  • and are reviewed in class.
  • Students describe him as , and strong at making difficult math manageable.
  • , and participation matter, but grading and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very reachable because , but students and attend reviews.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The math content can be hard, especially calculus and statistics, but and study guides make it easier to handle.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

because participation, lecture notes, and test reviews are central to passing.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend him because he teaches clearly and prepares them directly for exams.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades appear fair and supportive because tests follow study guides and partial credit is available.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Students mention plenty of , and study guides, but the work is purposeful rather than overwhelming.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students consistently describe him as , and .

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

84/100

Grades , and study guides.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

preparation, and caring teaching style.

Main concern

The class is lecture heavy with and participation.

What students said

“ .”
MATH191
“as long as you do your HW and do the study guide you will pass with noting lower than a B.”
MATH175
“ .”
MATH151

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent but student-friendly because they closely follow reviewed study guides and may include partial credit.

Study Guide Based ExamsFrequent ExamsPartial CreditIn-Class Exam Reviews

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

83/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and are reviewed before tests, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring rules.

Study Guide Based ExamsFrequent ExamsPartial CreditIn-Class Exam Reviews
“ .”
MATH191
“ .”
MATH151
“His class has alot of exams but they are chapter by chapter so they are easier!”
MATH191CALC2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I always look for him first, .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“Cal 2 is not an easy subject to understand, but he really makes it easy for his students.”

📘

83/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“I always look for him first, .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He really cares about teaching.
  • Pang explained the information in a lucid manner!
  • Answers all questions asked.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The as the study guides and doing both the study guides and the
  • as long as you do your HW and do the study guide you will pass with noting lower than a B.
  • .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • .
  • Moves fast, lots of notes, and makes you participate in class
  • hw took at least 6 to 12 hours to complete.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve detailed in-person reviews across several years show a consistent pattern of , and moderate workload.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1914 reviews
MATH1652 reviews
MA1751 review
MA1911 review
MAT1651 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH1511 review
MATH1751 review
MATH191CALC21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 4 · A 2

B range

4

B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values