AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kun Nui

MATH114 · MATH30 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you can teach yourself math and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesTough graderPoor supportFast pacingAvoided by students
  • All three reviews give the lowest quality rating and strongly discourage taking the class.
  • Students say , and pacing is frustrating.
  • as harsh, especially when work is not shown exactly her way.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because , and high frustration.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

20/100

The course feels hard because students report , and problems that seem unrelated to instruction.

, and all describe difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

No online evidence exists, and in-person comments .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students overwhelmingly advise against taking her because they find the and the .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students explicitly describe tough grading and losing credit unless problems are done exactly her way.

Format shift

, and the evidence is strongly harsh.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lecture-heavy work, many papers, and limited assignment detail.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students say lectures are hard to understand, support is lacking, and requests for review are refused.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention tests, papers, lectures, and problem-solving, but do not prove a .

Format shift

Only in-person comments mention assessment-related work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews , and poor support.

Main concern

Students report and .

What students said

“WORST. TEACHER. EVER. . SERIOUSLY.”
MATH114
“She still doesn't provide us enough information and materials for us to actually know how to do it.”
MATH30
“If you didn't do the problem exactly how she wanted it step by step it will be wrong, regardless if you got it right or not.”
MATH30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests but do .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam policy or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Would go onto the next chapter before we even took the .”
MATH30

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“WORST. TEACHER. EVER. . SERIOUSLY.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and difficulty. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“Terrible English, could barely lecture us and if we would ask to go over something she would say no.”

⚖️

12/100

“If you didn't do the problem exactly how she wanted it step by step it will be wrong, regardless if you got it right or not.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She still doesn't provide us enough information and materials for us to actually know how to do it.
  • Terrible English, could barely lecture us and if we would ask to go over something she would say no.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • WORST. TEACHER. EVER. . SERIOUSLY.
  • If you didn't do the problem exactly how she wanted it step by step it will be wrong, regardless if you got it right or not.
  • There are word problems that are unrelated to the class and expects us to know it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

The sample is small, but all three reviews are detailed, consistent, and strongly negative.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH302 reviews
MATH1141 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values