AI Rate Professor

English

Juliet Myrtetus

ENG101 · ENG103 · ENG99 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can , and learning without much feedback.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNice but disorganizedSlow gradingParticipation mattersInteresting assignmentsWeak feedback
  • Students describe her as nice and caring, but organization and .
  • Assignments can be interesting and easy, but .
  • This is risky for students who need structure, grade visibility, or help with English.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

as easy and grades can be decent, but participation and make the A uncertain.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The workload and , but poor structure makes the class harder for students who need guidance.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Students say attendance and participation matter, and one review links showing up to earning an A.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Students like her personality and assignments, but because grading and .

All because there are zero online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

One student calls her fair and grades are not described as harsh, but .

Format shift

because there are zero online reviews.

Workload

Light

75/100

as easy, cool, and fun, with .

Format shift

All because there are zero online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Her teaching can be interesting, but weak organization, missing syllabus, and .

Format shift

All because there are zero online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and few graded items rather than exams.

Format shift

All because there are zero online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a nice professor with interesting assignments but serious issues with , and structure.

Main concern

and lack of .

What students said

“Did not know my grade until the semester was over.”
ENG103
“There was no syllabus.”
ENG101
“If ”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or closed-book requirements.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Did not know my grade until the semester was over.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and class structure. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Her teaching is modern and interesting.”

⏳

58/100

“she doesn't grade anything.. very slow pace.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

45/100

“if you are struggling with .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Ms. Myrtetus is a great professor.
  • and understanding
  • There was no syllabus.

Theme 2

📋

  • This professor gave good assignments, but .
  • Very stressful if you want to know when assignments are due or what you got on a assignment.

Theme 3

🙋 About Participation

  • Participation matters
  • She does want you to participate in class such as verbally speaking.
  • I might have gotten an A if I showed up every day.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

and mostly from a narrow time period.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1012 reviews
ENG1032 reviews
ENG991 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values