AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kim Wonjoo

MATH170 · MATH029 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if and grade recovery options, but be ready for possible inconsistency in lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear When PreparedPatient HelperExtra CreditQuiz RetakesOccasional Disorganization
  • , but one review reports serious disorganization.
  • Grades can be helped by and , though one student calls her a tough grader.
  • All evidence is from in-person math courses, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A looks realistic with effort because and offset the risk of tough test grading.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

The course content is described as fairly simple, but .

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person MATH029 and MATH170 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Participation matters appears repeatedly, but the reviews do .

Only in-person reviews mention participation, and there is .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and patience, but one review strongly warns against taking her.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Retaking quizzes for full credit and tutoring suggest leniency, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Reviews mention tests, quizzes, participation, and tutoring , but not a consistently heavy workload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

, while one reports disorganization and incorrect problem solving.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

The reviews emphasize tests and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but lean positive because and grade support.

Main concern

One student reports disorganized notes, math mistakes, and .

What students said

“Detailed and easy to understand lectures, and gives for tutoring.”
MATH170
“The class material was fairly simple and .”
MATH029
“ . Her notes are all over the place.”
MATH029

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and , but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, midterm, or .

TestsQuizzesQuiz Retakes

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tests and , but .

TestsQuizzesQuiz Retakes
“She also does not go over the test problems and marks the whole answer wrong even if you got it half right.”
MATH029
“ and gives for tutoring.”
MATH029

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This Professor deserves every star because she is so and GENUINELY wants you to understand the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Detailed and easy to understand lectures, and gives for tutoring.”

⚖️

68/100

“ and gives for tutoring.”

⚠️ Main Risk

45/100

“The class constantly has to correct her on her math because she keeps getting the problems wrong.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • One of .
  • The class material was fairly simple and .
  • . Her notes are all over the place.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • and gives for tutoring.
  • She also does not go over the test problems and marks the whole answer wrong even if you got it half right.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but they include specific and conflicting details about teaching and grading.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH0292 reviews
MATH1701 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values