AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Alaa Selim

MATH175 · MAT175 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you can attend every lecture, adapt to changing expectations, and handle a demanding math class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLecture heavyTough grading concernsLots of homeworkUnclear policiesEntertaining but inconsistent
  • Student opinion is split, but most reviews warn that the class is difficult and lecture dependent.
  • Several comments describe unclear or and schedules.
  • He can be entertaining and respected, but the risk level is high for students who need structure.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students must follow his methods closely, attend lectures, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The math course is described as difficult, lecture heavy, and dependent on doing things his way.

Only in-person comments describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Reviews strongly imply that skipping class is risky because lectures and notes are essential.

In-person reviews repeatedly warn students to attend; no online reviews exist.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most reviewers would not take , and grading concerns.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report , and a need to solve problems his way.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

One review explicitly reports lots of homework, and the course is repeatedly described as demanding.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

He has some positive comments for feedback and humor, but several reviews criticize intimidation and inconsistency.

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is mixed and somewhat polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews emphasize homework, lectures, notes, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a difficult, lecture-heavy class with mixed teaching impressions and .

Main concern

Students report lots of , and .

What students said

“He gives out a lot of if the problems he gives you are possible to do”
MATH175
“ .”
MATH175
“Difficult class but still enjoyable.”
MATH175

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

No Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

No Clear Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Always go to lectures and so you know how to do things "his way" your grade depends on it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and structure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Interesting teacher. He's pretty entertaining when he wants to be.”

⚖️

28/100

“ .”

📚 Workload

25/100

“He gives out a lot of if the problems he gives you are possible to do”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His classes are lecture heavy, the main issue with him is he can be intimidating with .
  • Interesting teacher. He's pretty entertaining when he wants to be.
  • ; no doubts in my mind.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Difficult class but still enjoyable.
  • If you don't do it his way you won't pass
  • Always go to lectures and so you know how to do things "his way" your grade depends on it.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Structure

  • Expect calendar changes though, the schedule at the beginning of the semester isn't what it ends up being.
  • He often goes back on his decisions/ changes his mind all the time to the detriment of the students.
  • Seems like everything is based on a .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews are detailed and consistent about risk, but the sample is small and includes one strongly positive outlier.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1753 reviews
MAT1751 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1