AI Rate Professor

English

Stacey Joshua

ENG103 · ENG101 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid Joshua unless , and accept tough grading.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy writing workloadPoor organizationLimited feedbackSelf-teaching required
  • as harsh and passing as difficult.
  • Several reviews report , and little personalized help.
  • A few students learned writing skills, but the overall recommendation signal is very weak.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A requires sustained writing effort, strict requirement-following, and strong self-management.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The course is challenging because students report , and .

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Tags and comments indicate skipping class is risky, though the .

; there is no online evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Students generally do not recommend her because , and .

The recommendation judgment .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or harsh grader with no and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students report , and multiple assignments at once.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Some students say she can teach writing, but many cite , and little assistance.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears , and essays rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and limited feedback.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves writing structure while .

What students said

“Very difficult to pass the class.”
ENG101
“her organization is the .”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews mainly discuss papers, quizzes, and workload, with only a .

Midterm MentionedWriting AssignmentsQuizzes

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a midterm, but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Weekly QuizzesMidterm Mentioned
“1 reading asgmt, paper, and ”
ENG101
“except for the weeks the research paper and ”
ENG101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very difficult to pass the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching support; credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

18/100

“She's a , but as long as you do the work you should pass.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“Gave the class 3 assignments at the same time all due different days though but very difficult to do.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“For instruction on how to write a Cafe, Purdue or UNC website and teach yourself.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • if you do not do the requirements she gives on Blackboard.
  • She is a and expects alot from her students.
  • She will definitely help you develop better writing skills, however she is a .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • 1 reading asgmt, paper, and
  • Gave the class 3 assignments at the same time all due different days though but very difficult to do.
  • Took her fall 2014 and got an A but I .

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization and Support

  • her organization is the .
  • She gives no feed back on or personalized assistance.
  • Won't answer emails at all at least ones I sent.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 8 reviews provide specific and mostly consistent complaints, but the sample size is limited.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1013 reviews
ENG1032 reviews
1011 review
206021 review
206371 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values