AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Roman Selezinka

MATH170 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you value a and can handle possible accent and pacing challenges.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKnowledgeableCaringAccent barrierFast lecturesIndependent study needed
  • One recent review is extremely positive and calls him the .
  • The older review says he is educated and eager but hard to understand.
  • Students may need independent study because lectures can move quickly and accent clarity may be an issue.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

The single reported A+ is positive, but the comments suggest independent study is needed rather than an effortless A.

All , so confidence is limited.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Math 170 appears moderately challenging because pacing and understandability can create extra work.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews .

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

, but communication barriers keep the recommendation from being universal.

All recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

There is too little grading detail, with one A+ reported and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist and .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The workload is not clearly described, but one student warns of a lot of independent study.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students describe him as educated, caring, and inspirational, though one review says his accent and speed hurt clarity.

Format shift

Teaching evidence and is mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

No format-specific review provides enough assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and mixed, with one excellent review and one warning about accent, speed, and independent study.

Main concern

The main concern is understanding fast lectures through a heavy accent.

What students said

“ !!!!!”
MATH170
“he was really hard to understand.”
MATH170
“you'll have ALOT of independent study ahead of you”
MATH170

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, finals, or quiz structure.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he was really hard to understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity and study effort. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ !!!!!”

⚠️ Clarity Concern

45/100

“he was really hard to understand.”

📚 Independent Study

45/100

“you'll have ALOT of independent study ahead of you”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • !!!!!
  • very educated with a willingness to teach and an eagerness for us to learn

Theme 2

⚠️ About Clarity

  • he was really hard to understand.
  • He had a heavy accent and sped through the lecture

Theme 3

📚 About Study Effort

  • you'll have ALOT of independent study ahead of you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because only two reviews exist, they are years apart, and they give mixed signals.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1702 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values