AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Phuongthao Vo

MATH165 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can learn independently and handle limited support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnsupportiveFast LecturesHarsh Exams
  • The only review describes a very negative in-person experience.
  • The student says lectures moved too fast and help was refused.
  • as harsh because work shown did not receive credit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

A B was possible, but the and support was poor.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course felt difficult mainly because lectures moved quickly and .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The student directly because of poor support and harsh exams.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

The .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The review .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

The student describes the instructor as uncaring, fast-paced, and unwilling to help.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

The only specific assessment evidence concerns exams and lost credit.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person review reports fast lectures, poor support, and .

Main concern

Students may struggle .

What students said

“She flies through each lecture, doesn't care about her student, .”
MATH165

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the exam format, but the for work shown.

Strict Exam GradingNo Work-Shown Credit

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The because shown work did not receive credit.

Strict Exam GradingNo Work-Shown Credit
“ ”
MATH165

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She flies through each lecture, doesn't care about her student, .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“She flies through each lecture, doesn't care about her student, .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“ ”

⚖️

10/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She flies through each lecture
  • she didn't seem to care that I was reaching out for help

Theme 2

📈

  • She once told me, "i can't help you."

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the evidence is specific but very limited.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1651 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values