AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sandy Lopez Najera

MATH29 · TRIG151 · MATH165 · STATD · STATS165 · MATH151 · MA165 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take Lopez Najera if you want a and practice are rewarded.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear LecturesNo Mandatory HomeworkExam ReviewsHelpfulMath Anxiety Friendly
  • Most students call Lopez Najera an , and supportive math professor.
  • , but doing practice problems is important for exams.
  • , and a small minority found his teaching weak.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

An A looks very attainable if students do the , and keep up with projects.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Math content still requires practice, but students , and less intimidating.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

, and several emphasize non-mandatory homework rather than strict attendance.

The .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Most students highly recommend him for , and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Reviews describe , and strong prep, though one review criticized grading structure.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

, but practice and a statistics project still require effort.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Most reviews praise his clarity, patience, humor, accessibility, and ability to reduce math anxiety despite two negative outliers.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Comments , and a statistics project, with little graded homework.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly , and predictable exams, with a few negative outliers.

Main concern

The course and self-directed practice.

What students said

“ , so no surprises.”
MATH165
“ .”
30365

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequent but student-friendly because and provides strong review support.

Four ExamsExam ReviewsNo Surprise QuestionsFormulas ProvidedProject

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe four exams, exam reviews, covered test questions, and formulas provided, with .

Four ExamsExam ReviewsNo Surprise QuestionsFormulas ProvidedProject
“ ”
STATD
“4 exams, 4 exam reviews and a stats project.”
MATH165
“He gave us the formulas needed for ”
MATH165
“Reviews what .”
MATH151

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“THIS IS BY FAR THE .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“ as far as math can possibly go”

👍 Recommendation Level

92/100

“ !”

📈

82/100

“ , so no surprises.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Legit professor, makes lectures fun.
  • Very patient and funny.
  • he uses real examples which kept the class interested.
  • .

Theme 2

📈

  • No Homework, No quizzes, 4 exams, 4 exam reviews and a stats project.
  • If you do the .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • he wants everyone to do well not just in class but on life.
  • He makes himself available to those that need the extra help
  • If you have any type of Math anxiety, he will work with you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen detailed in-person reviews across multiple math courses show a strong positive pattern with a .

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1514 reviews
MATH1653 reviews
1651 review
303651 review
MA1651 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH291 review
STATD1 review
STATS1651 review
TRIG1511 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 2 · Rather not say 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1