AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

DI Reagan

MATH29 · MATH030 · MATH165 · MATH151 · TRIGTRIG · MATH130 · STAT200 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take DI Reagan if you want a and and mixed teaching consistency.

Best fit · Effort For RewardVery helpfulHeavy homeworkMixed clarityTest-focusedSupportive when effective
  • Many students call Reagan helpful, caring, and .
  • A smaller but , and confusing tests.
  • , so success depends on steady effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades seem achievable with help, study guides, , and homework, but some students still struggled badly.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

She can make difficult math easier for some students, but and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they conflict strongly on clarity.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

, but students say class notes are important for success.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

, but negative reviews warn about confusion and harsh tests.

Only in-person reviews exist, and recommendations are polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and , but some reviews mention harsh grading and difficult tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Several reviews mention a lot or enormous amounts of .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

The majority describe her as very helpful and caring, though several reviews report serious clarity and organization problems.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

, and tests, with tests appearing central to grades.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

help and clarity alongside serious complaints about confusion and tests.

Main concern

Students who struggle with and manage a lot of homework.

What students said

“She was SO helpful and SO sweet.”
MATH151
“To pass you have to teach yourself math.”
MATH29
“Gave us lot of hw.”
MATH165

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

guides and some , while reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or book rules.

TestsStudy GuidesExtra Credit Opportunities

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or strict proctoring policies.

TestsStudy GuidesExtra Credit Opportunities
“Gave us opportunities and pretty much told us what is going .”
MATH151
“she gives study guides for all the test.”
MATH151
“ and she grades harshly.”
TRIGTRIG

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and make a diffucult class much easier.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and tests. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She will do everything to help the .”

📚 Workload

32/100

“She is a great teacher but gives a enormous amount of homework.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

68/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was SO helpful and SO sweet.
  • She will do everything to help the .
  • Not helpful and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Gave us opportunities and pretty much told us what is going .
  • she gives study guides for all the test.
  • and she grades harshly.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • She is a great teacher but gives a enormous amount of homework.
  • Gave us lot of hw.
  • Adequate HW, as long as you don't procratinate, you're good to go.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 10 detailed in-person reviews provide , and inconsistent clarity.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1514 reviews
MATH0301 review
MATH1301 review
MATH1651 review
MATH291 review
Show 2 more courses
STAT2001 review
TRIGTRIG1 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values