AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Theodore Hsu

MA150 · STAT227 · MATH150 · MATH227 · MATH130 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
11/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you already understand the material and can teach yourself.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandPoor explanationsSelf-teaching requiredNot recommendedHigh difficulty
  • Students consistently say he is very hard to understand and .
  • Several reviews say asking questions does not help and can cause more confusion.
  • Students describe needing tutoring, math lab hours, or self-teaching to pass.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

14/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report major effort, tutoring needs, and confusion even when trying hard.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The math content becomes much harder because students cannot follow the lectures or .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students overwhelmingly warn against taking him because they cannot understand his teaching.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Grades are not well documented, but students report failing or needing extreme effort to pass.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

The , but the as very high.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Reviews consistently describe unclear explanations, poor answers to questions, and little concern for student learning.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

and quizzes but do not clearly prove whether exams or .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are consistently negative, with students and outside help is needed.

Main concern

Students struggle to understand lectures and get useful help.

What students said

“even when i put lots of effort to understand what he talked about it is very hard to understand him”
MATH227
“I spent 90 hours in the .”
STAT227
“u basically have to pay to teach yourself...”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam Policy Unclear

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Exam Policy Unclear

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“u basically have to pay to teach yourself... sooo wasted a good amount of money!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“when you ask questions he dont know what to say or answer he shouldn't be teachingat all.”

🚫 Recommendation Level

8/100

“ ! GET OUT WHILE U STILL CAN!”

📈 Difficulty & Effort

14/100

“I spent 90 hours in the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • it is very hard to understand him
  • Ask for help and .
  • totally should not be a teacher

Theme 2

📚 About Self-Teaching

  • Find a tutor if you want to pass his class.
  • u basically have to pay to teach yourself...
  • he dont worry if the students learn or not.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recommendation

  • IF YOU WANT TO PASS!
  • I don't recomend this professor unless .
  • I did not like this teacher at all.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

There are only 7 old reviews, but the negative pattern is highly consistent across courses.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MA1502 reviews
MATH1502 reviews
MATH1301 review
MATH2271 review
STAT2271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values