AI Rate Professor

English

Thomas Burmingham

ENG101 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable learning from a dry, traditional teaching style with little student enthusiasm.

Best fit · Self Taught ProOld Style TeachingUnengaging LecturesHigh DifficultyLow Recommendation
  • The only review describes the teaching as old-fashioned and uninteresting.
  • The course felt difficult without enough engaging instruction.
  • Evidence is very limited because there .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

There is no grade evidence, and the high difficulty rating suggests getting an A .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course seems hard mainly because the teaching style is not engaging or supportive.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

The student explicitly wished they had taken the course with another instructor.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, but the high difficulty rating gives little .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Workload is not described, but the course is rated difficult and .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

The only review says the teaching is old-style, not fun, and not interesting.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and low engagement.

Main concern

Lectures may feel dull and unhelpful.

What students said

“old style teaching, not fun nor interesting.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The proctoring.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“old style teaching, not fun nor interesting. wished i would have taken this course with another instructor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting teaching style and recommendation tone. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“old style teaching, not fun nor interesting.”

👍 Recommendation Level

20/100

“wished i would have taken this course with another instructor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • old style teaching, not fun nor interesting.
  • wished i would have taken this course with another instructor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so confidence is low despite a .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values