AI Rate Professor

English

Wood Jack

ENGL101 · ENG101 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

Avoid unless you specifically want a demanding English class and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderDisorganized LecturesHigh DifficultyContentious ClassroomNot Easy A
  • Most reviews describe poor teaching, off-topic lectures, and .
  • One student says the class taught them a lot, but still required earning the grade.
  • The overall experience is risky because difficulty is high and student satisfaction is very low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

Getting an A appears difficult because and say the grade must be earned.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course seems intellectually and emotionally demanding because students report , and strict expectations.

All course difficulty evidence comes from in-person ENG101 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly describe an .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students do not recommend him because they , and frustrating classroom behavior.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students explicitly describe poor grading and say he will not give an easy A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Workload details are limited, but the high difficulty and earned-grade comments suggest a demanding class.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss the course, and none give detailed workload structure.

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

Two of three reviews strongly criticize his teaching, classroom conduct, and organization.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

The , and there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with complaints , and a difficult path to an A.

Main concern

and frustrating classroom interactions.

What students said

“constantly got off subject and went off on students over the dumbest things.”
ENG101
“ .”
ENGL101
“hes not goin to give u an easy A u have to earn it!”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“plain and simple:should not be teaching anymore.”

⚖️

18/100

“refused to say he was wrong, put you on the spot,& graded poorly.”

📈 Difficulty & Grades

25/100

“hes not goin to give u an easy A u have to earn it!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • constantly got off subject and went off on students over the dumbest things.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he is not the easiest english teacher on campus thats for sure
  • hes not goin to give u an easy A u have to earn it!

Theme 3

🧠 About Learning Value

  • i learned more in his class then i did in taken 3 other english classes combined.
  • i think overall he is a great teacher

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they are intense but limited in detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1012 reviews
ENGL1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values